Inattentional blindness with the same scene at different scales

People with severely restricted peripheral visual fields have difficulty walking confidently and safely in the physical environment. Augmented vision devices that we are developing for low‐vision rehabilitation implement vision multiplexing, providing two views of the same scene at two different scales (sizes), with a cartooned minified wide view overlaying a natural see‐through view. Inattentional blindness may partially limit the utility of these devices as low‐vision aids. Inattentional blindness, the apparent inability to notice significant but unexpected events in an unattended scene when attention is fixed on another scene, has classically been demonstrated by overlaying two unrelated game scenes, with unexpected events occurring in one scene while attention is maintained on the other scene by a distractor task. We hypothesized that context like that provided by the related wide view in our devices might mitigate inattentional blindness in a study with two simultaneous views of the same scene shown at different scales. It did not, and unexpected event detection rates were remarkably consistent with our and other mixed‐scene studies. Still, detecting about half of the unexpected events bodes well for our use of vision aids that employ vision multiplexing. Without the aids, is it likely that many more events would be missed.

[1]  Gang Luo,et al.  Collision judgment when using an augmented-vision head-mounted display device. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Adaptive Gaze Control in Natural Environments , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Eli Peli,et al.  Inattentional blindness and augmented‐vision displays: effects of cartoon‐like filtering and attended scene , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  Gang Luo,et al.  Applications of augmented‐vision head‐mounted systems in vision rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[5]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Control of attention and gaze in complex environments. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[6]  Gang Luo,et al.  Use of an augmented-vision device for visual search by patients with tunnel vision. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[8]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  The effects of eye movements, spatial attention, and stimulus features on inattentional blindness , 2004, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[10]  E Peli,et al.  Vision Multiplexing: an Engineering Approach to Vision Rehabilitation Device Development , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  PSYCHE an interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness Sustained Inattentional Blindness : The Role of Location in the Detection of Unexpected Dynamic Events , 2000 .

[13]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[14]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  Gary E. Riccio,et al.  Responses to Optical Looming in the Retinal Center and Periphery , 1990 .

[17]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[18]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.