Esophageal Cancer: Associations With (pN+) Lymph Node Metastases

Objectives: To identify the associations of lymph node metastases (pN+), number of positive nodes, and pN subclassification with cancer, treatment, patient, geographic, and institutional variables, and to recommend extent of lymphadenectomy needed to accurately detect pN+ for esophageal cancer. Summary Background Data: Limited data and traditional analytic techniques have precluded identifying intricate associations of pN+ with other cancer, treatment, and patient characteristics. Methods: Data on 5806 esophagectomy patients from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration were analyzed by Random Forest machine learning techniques. Results: pN+, number of positive nodes, and pN subclassification were associated with increasing depth of cancer invasion (pT), increasing cancer length, decreasing cancer differentiation (G), and more regional lymph nodes resected. Lymphadenectomy necessary to accurately detect pN+ is 60 for shorter, well-differentiated cancers (<2.5 cm) and 20 for longer, poorly differentiated ones. Conclusions: In esophageal cancer, pN+, increasing number of positive nodes, and increasing pN classification are associated with deeper invading, longer, and poorly differentiated cancers. Consequently, if the goal of lymphadenectomy is to accurately define pN+ status of such cancers, few nodes need to be removed. Conversely, superficial, shorter, and well-differentiated cancers require a more extensive lymphadenectomy to accurately define pN+ status.

[1]  B. Esmaeli,et al.  Prognostic Value of the Staging System for Eyelid Tumors in the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. , 2017, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  E. Blackstone,et al.  Lymph node ratio: a confounded quotient. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  H. Ishwaran,et al.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction , 2010, Cancer.

[4]  Udaya B. Kogalur,et al.  High-Dimensional Variable Selection for Survival Data , 2010 .

[5]  H. Ishwaran,et al.  Optimum Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[6]  H. Ishwaran,et al.  A novel approach to cancer staging: application to esophageal cancer. , 2009, Biostatistics.

[7]  V. Rusch,et al.  Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. , 2009, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[8]  N. Altorki,et al.  Predicting Systemic Disease in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: A Multinational Study on the Significance of the Number of Involved Lymph Nodes , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[9]  H. Ishwaran,et al.  Random survival forests , 2008, 0811.1645.

[10]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: Length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors? , 2006, Journal of surgical oncology.

[11]  C. Gostout,et al.  Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma. Analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  M. Feith,et al.  Histologic Tumor Type Is an Independent Prognostic Parameter in Esophageal Cancer: Lessons From More Than 1,000 Consecutive Resections at a Single Center in the Western World , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[13]  Y. Tachimori,et al.  Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[14]  J. Goldblum,et al.  Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[16]  G. Hommel,et al.  How many lymph nodes are needed for an accurate pN classification in esophageal cancer? Evidence for a new threshold value. , 2002, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[17]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.