The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes PILPS phase 2 c Red–Arkansas River basin experiment: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes

(cid:14) . The water-balance components of 16 Soil–Vegetation Atmospheric Transfer SVAT schemes were evaluated by comparing predicted and observed streamflow, predicted evapotranspiration and evapotranspiration inferred from an (cid:14) . atmospheric moisture budget analysis, and soil moisture storage changes for a seven-year period 1980–1986 using data from the Red–Arkansas River basins of the Southern Great Plains of the USA. The evaluations support the following (cid:14) . suggestions: a The mean annual runoff of all models follows, at least generally, the strong climatic East–West gradient of (cid:14) . precipitation, although most models predict too much runoff in the dry part of the basin. b The mean monthly storage change tends to be underestimated, even though all models capture reasonably well the seasonality of the evapotranspiration. (cid:14) . c The wide range of conceptualizations used for generation of surface and subsurface runoff strongly affect runoff generation on seasonal, and shorter, time scales. Model responses to summer precipitation ranged from almost no summer (cid:14) . (cid:14) . runoff one model to the more common situation of persistent overprediction of summer runoff, especially in the driest (cid:14) . (cid:14) . part of the basin. d All models tended to underpredict evapotranspiration in summer and overpredict in winter. e Model-derived mean seasonal cycles of changes in soil moisture storage are qualitatively similar to those inferred from observations, but most models do not predict the decrease in April soil moisture storage and the increase in October that is inferred from observations. q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Yaping Shao,et al.  On the Choice of Soil Hydraulic Models in Land-Surface Schemes , 1999 .

[2]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes PILPS Phase 2 c Red–Arkansas River basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons , 1998 .

[3]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[4]  Dag Lohmann,et al.  A large‐scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes , 1996 .

[5]  P. Milly,et al.  Sensitivity of the Global Water Cycle to the Water-Holding Capacity of Land , 1994 .

[6]  Ch. Obled,et al.  Unit hydrograph revisited: an alternate iterative approach to UH and effective precipitation identification , 1993 .

[7]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[8]  M. Franchini,et al.  Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 1991 .

[9]  David S. Bowles,et al.  Recent advances in the modeling of hydrologic systems , 1991 .

[10]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Hydraulic and Hydrologic Flood Routing Schemes , 1991 .

[11]  Javier-Yves Rodriguez-Hernandez Modélisation pluie-débit par la méthode DPFT : développements de la méthode initiale et extension à des cas bi-entrées , 1989 .

[12]  Charles W. Boast,et al.  Introduction to Soil Physics , 1983 .

[13]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[14]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  M. J. HALL,et al.  Hydrology for Engineers , 1969, Nature.

[16]  V. Starr,et al.  On the Global Balance of Water Vapor and the Hydrology of Deserts , 1958 .

[17]  L. A. Richards Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums , 1931 .