A dual modeling approach to automatic segmentation of cerebral T2 hyperintensities and T1 black holes in multiple sclerosis

Background and purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for in vivo detection and characterization of white matter lesions (WML) in multiple sclerosis (MS). The most widely established MRI outcome measure is the volume of hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted images (T2L). Unfortunately, T2L are non-specific for the level of tissue destruction and show a weak relationship to clinical status. Interest in lesions that appear hypointense on T1-weighted images (T1L) (“black holes”) has grown because T1L provide more specificity for axonal loss and a closer link to neurologic disability. The technical difficulty of T1L segmentation has led investigators to rely on time-consuming manual assessments prone to inter- and intra-rater variability. This study aims to develop an automatic T1L segmentation approach, adapted from a T2L segmentation algorithm. Materials and methods T1, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were acquired from 40 MS subjects at 3 Tesla (3 T). T2L and T1L were manually segmented. A Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis (MIMoSA) was then employed. Results Using cross-validation, MIMoSA proved to be robust for segmenting both T2L and T1L. For T2L, a Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) of 0.66 and partial AUC (pAUC) up to 1% false positive rate of 0.70 were achieved. For T1L, 0.53 DSC and 0.64 pAUC were achieved. Manual and MIMoSA segmented volumes were correlated and resulted in 0.88 for T1L and 0.95 for T2L. The correlation between Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and manual versus automatic volumes were similar for T1L (0.32 manual vs. 0.34 MIMoSA), T2L (0.33 vs. 0.32), and the T1L/T2L ratio (0.33 vs 0.33). Conclusions Though originally designed to segment T2L, MIMoSA performs well for segmenting T1 black holes in patients with MS.

[1]  F. Jacques Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions , 2015, Neurology.

[2]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Probabilistic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Classification Based on Modeling Regional Intensity Variability and Local Neighborhood Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  David H. Miller,et al.  The precision of T1 hypointense lesion volume quantification in multiple sclerosis treatment trials: a multicenter study , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[5]  A. Odén,et al.  High nationwide prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Sweden , 2011, Multiple sclerosis.

[6]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Brain MRI lesions and atrophy are associated with employment status in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2015, Journal of Neurology.

[7]  S D Walter,et al.  The partial area under the summary ROC curve , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  A topology-preserving approach to the segmentation of brain images with multiple sclerosis lesions , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Alex Rovira,et al.  Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI: A review of automated approaches , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Dual‐Sensitivity Multiple Sclerosis Lesion and CSF Segmentation for Multichannel 3T Brain MRI , 2017, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[11]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.

[12]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Role of MRI in multiple sclerosis I: inflammation and lesions. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[13]  Alex Rovira,et al.  MR in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an overview. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Hanne F. Harbo,et al.  Sex and gender issues in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[15]  Sheena L. Dupuy,et al.  An MRI-defined measure of cerebral lesion severity to assess therapeutic effects in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Journal of Neurology.

[16]  M. Ursekar,et al.  Systematic imaging review: Multiple Sclerosis , 2015, Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.

[17]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: correlation with expanded disability status scale (EDSS) , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[18]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. , 2014, Neurology.

[19]  G. Comi,et al.  Semi‐automated thresholding technique for measuring lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis: effects of the change of the threshold on the computed lesion loads , 1996, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[20]  Brian Avants,et al.  Neuroconductor: an R platform for medical imaging analysis , 2019, Biostatistics.

[21]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  OASIS is Automated Statistical Inference for Segmentation, with applications to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation in MRI☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[22]  R Bakshi,et al.  The Impact of Lesion In-Painting and Registration Methods on Voxel-Based Morphometry in Detecting Regional Cerebral Gray Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  A Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms and Feature Vectors for MS Lesion Segmentation Using Multimodal Structural MRI , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Imaging of multiple sclerosis: Role in neurotherapeutics , 2005, NeuroRX.

[25]  Russell T. Shinohara,et al.  Population-wide principal component-based quantification of blood–brain-barrier dynamics in multiple sclerosis , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  Bilwaj Gaonkar,et al.  Multi-atlas skull-stripping. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[27]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  MIMoSA: A Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  Robert Zivadinov,et al.  Improved assessment of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation agreement via detection and outline error estimates , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[29]  John Muschelli,et al.  MIMoSA: An Automated Method for Intermodal Segmentation Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesions , 2018, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[30]  P. Cattin,et al.  Tracking the Evolution of Cerebral Gadolinium‐Enhancing Lesions to Persistent T1 Black Holes in Multiple Sclerosis: Validation of a Semiautomated Pipeline , 2017, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[31]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[32]  Sheena L. Dupuy,et al.  MRI detection of hypointense brain lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: T1 spin-echo vs. gradient-echo. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[33]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Performance comparison of 10 different classification techniques in segmenting white matter hyperintensities in aging , 2017, NeuroImage.

[34]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[35]  Roland Opfer,et al.  Fully automatic detection of deep white matter T1 hypointense lesions in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Ponnada A. Narayana,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of black holes in multiple sclerosis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  Ying Wu,et al.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesion subtypes with multichannel MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  Farzad Towhidkhah,et al.  A novel method for automatic determination of different stages of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR FLAIR images , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[39]  Russell T. Shinohara,et al.  Subject-level measurement of local cortical coupling , 2016, NeuroImage.