fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks

Scanner noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may interfere with brain function and change blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals, a problem that generally worsens at the higher field strengths. Therefore, we studied the effect of increased acoustic noise on fMRI during verbal working memory (WM) processing. The sound pressure level of scanner noise was increased by 12 dBA from "Quiet" to "Loud" echo planar imaging (EPI) scans by utilizing resonant vibration modes of the gradient coil. A WM paradigm with graded levels of task difficulty was used to further access WM load. Increased scanner noise produced increased BOLD responses (percent signal change) bilaterally in the cerebellum, inferior (IFG), medial (medFG), and superior (SFG) frontal, fusiform (FusG), and the lingual (LG) gyri, and decreased BOLD responses bilaterally in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG) and the putamen. This finding suggests greater recruitment of attention resources in these brain regions, probably to compensate for interference due to louder scanner noise. Increased working memory load increased the BOLD signals in IFG and the cerebellum, but decreased the BOLD signals in the putamen and the LG. These findings also support the idea that brain function requires additional attention resources under noisier conditions. Load- and acoustic-noise-related changes in BOLD responses correlated negatively in the WM network. This study demonstrates that MR noise affects brain activation pattern. Future comparisons between studies performed under different acoustic conditions (due to differing magnetic field strengths, pulse sequences, or scanner manufacturers) might require knowledge of the sound pressure level of acoustic noise during fMRI.

[1]  Linda Chang,et al.  k-Space based summary motion detection for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Practice-induced changes of brain function during visual attention: a parametric fMRI study at 4 Tesla , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain for working memory , 2000, Neuroreport.

[5]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  A R Palmer,et al.  Time‐course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D. Lim,et al.  Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: A study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Neuroanatomic Overlap of Working Memory and Spatial Attention Networks: A Functional MRI Comparison within Subjects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  J R Ives,et al.  Functional burst imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[12]  P. McGuire,et al.  Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: an event‐related fMRI study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[13]  R I Kitney,et al.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  K Scheffler,et al.  The MR tomograph as a sound generator: fMRI tool for the investigation of the auditory cortex , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Steve C R Williams,et al.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  High contrast and fast three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at high fields , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Echo planar imaging at 4 tesla with minimum acoustic noise , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Functional Fields in Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Time-Resolved fMRI without Interference of EPI Noise , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  Y Yang,et al.  A silent event‐related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Veena Kumari,et al.  Cognitive effects of nicotine in humans: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Impact of fMRI Acoustic Noise on the Functional Anatomy of Visual Mental Imagery , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Adaptation of the attention network in human immunodeficiency virus brain injury , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[27]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[30]  F G Shellock,et al.  Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  T. Ernst,et al.  Neural correlates of attention and working memory deficits in HIV patients , 2001, Neurology.

[32]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Reduction of Gradient Acoustic Noise in MRI Using SENSE-EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Incorporating Prior Knowledge into Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Human brain mapping.