Improving life expectancy and decreasing the incidence of complications associated with type 2 diabetes: a modelling study of HbA1c targets

To project the long‐term clinical and cost outcomes that accompany predefined improvements in glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. A peer‐reviewed, validated, non‐product‐specific Markov model of type 2 diabetes was used to project the long‐term clinical and cost outcomes associated with three HbA1c reduction scenarios (vs. no reduction): (i) decreasing mean HbA1c from 9.5% to 8.0%; (ii) from 8.0% to 7.0%; and (iii) from 7.0% to 6.5%. A typical baseline US type 2 diabetes cohort derived from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data was simulated over a lifetime horizon (35 years). Incidence of diabetes‐related complications and costs (2005 USD) were accounted based on published data. Discount rates (3% per annum) were applied to clinical benefits and costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Stepwise reductions in HbA1c as an independent variable correlated with delayed time to diabetes‐related complications and a reduced cumulative incidence of complications, including cardiovascular, renal and neurologic comorbidities. Related costs also decreased. Reductions in both poorly‐ (9.5–8.0%) and better‐controlled (7.0–6.5%) patients produced incremental gains in undiscounted life expectancy (LE) [1.06 (0.31) and 0.32 (0.34) years [mean (SD)], respectively]. Similar improvement patterns were observed in quality‐adjusted life expectancy (QALE). Benefits from sequential reduction scenarios, when aggregated, exhibited the most dramatic effect. Improved glycaemic control was associated with reductions in complication rates and costs, as well as increased LE and QALE among type 2 patients. These data illustrate the long‐term importance of reaching normoglycaemia and support intensified HbA1c control as a cornerstone of effective long‐term type 2 diabetes management.

[1]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  T. Links,et al.  Cost and benefits of a multidisciplinary intensive diabetes education programme. , 2005, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  A. Detsky,et al.  Measuring health outcomes--putting gains into perspective. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Mainous Ag rd,et al.  Use of microalbuminuria testing in persons with type 2 diabetes: are the right patients being tested? , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[5]  Volker Foos,et al.  Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies. , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.

[6]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. , 2003, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  D. Margolis,et al.  Treatment Options for Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcers: A Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis , 2001, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[8]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[9]  Y. Jang,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010 by the American Diabetes Association: Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease , 2010 .

[10]  O. Pedersen,et al.  Intensive integrated therapy of type 2 diabetes: implications for long-term prognosis. , 2004, Diabetes.

[11]  H. von Gizycki,et al.  Control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes and hypertension at urban academic medical centers. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[12]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Gains in life expectancy from medical interventions--standardizing data on outcomes. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Holman,et al.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) , 1998, The Lancet.

[14]  Jaime Caro,et al.  Estimates of direct medical costs for microvascular and macrovascular complications resulting from type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States in 2000. , 2003, Clinical therapeutics.

[15]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[16]  N. Lurie,et al.  Racial variation in the control of diabetes among elderly medicare managed care beneficiaries. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[17]  S. Bowlin,et al.  Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[18]  L S Phillips,et al.  Meeting American Diabetes Association guidelines in endocrinologist practice. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[19]  B. Zinman,et al.  Effect of intensive therapy on early macrovascular disease in young individuals with type 1 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[20]  A H Briggs,et al.  Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. , 1997, Health economics.

[21]  V. Hodges,et al.  Diabetes self-management training program in a community clinic improves patient outcomes at modest cost. , 2004, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[22]  L. Bouter,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[23]  R. Holman,et al.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Volker Foos,et al.  The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting Long-term Clinical Outcomes, Costs and Costeffectiveness of Interventions in Diabetes Mellitus (Types 1 and 2) to Support Clinical and Reimbursement Decision-making , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.

[25]  N. Clark,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes: Response to Power , 2006 .

[26]  D. Reda,et al.  Design of the cooperative study on glycemic control and complications in diabetes mellitus type 2: Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. , 2003, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[27]  A. Palmer,et al.  Impact of Changes in HbA1c, Lipids and Blood Pressure on Long-term Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: An Analysis Using the CORE Diabetes Model , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.

[28]  P. Scuffham,et al.  Predicted costs and outcomes from reduced vibration detection in people with diabetes in the U.S. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[29]  C. Langefeld,et al.  Prevalence of Nephropathy in Black Patients with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus , 2002, American Journal of Nephrology.

[30]  C. Sueta,et al.  Trends in lipid management among patients with coronary artery disease: has diabetes received the attention it deserves? , 2003, Diabetes care.

[31]  Robert A Gabbay,et al.  Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 Diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[32]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Treating All Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.