A Review Of Interoperability Standards And Initiatives In Electronic Government

Being important at organizational, process and semantic levels, interoperability became a key characteristic of the new electronic government systems and services, over the last decade. As a crucial prerequisite for automated process execution leading to “one-stop” e-Government services, interoperability has been systematically prescribed, since the dawn of the 21st century: Standardization frameworks, that included guidelines ranging from simple statements to well defined international Web-Service standards started to appear at National and Cross-Country levels, powered by governments, the European Union or the United Nations. In parallel, most international software, hardware and service vendors created their own strategies for achieving the goal of open, collaborative, loosely coupled systems and components. The paper presents the main milestones in this fascinating quest that shaped electronic government during the last 10 years, describing National Frameworks, key Pan-European projects, international standardization and main industrial and research achievements. Moreover, the paper describes the next steps needed to achieve interoperability at technical, semantic, organizational, legal or policy level – leading to the transformation of administrative processes and the provision of low-cost, high-quality services to citizens and businesses.

[1]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Is E-Government Research a Flash in the Pan or Here for the Long Shot? , 2006, EGOV.

[2]  Anne H. H. Ngu,et al.  Business-to-business interactions: issues and enabling technologies , 2003, The VLDB Journal.

[3]  G. Garson,et al.  The promise of digital government , 2004 .

[4]  Christine Legner,et al.  Preface to the Focus Theme Section: 'Business Interoperability' Business Interoperability Research: Present Achievements and Upcoming Challenges , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[5]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Integration in E-Government , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .

[7]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A review of electronic government interoperability frameworks: patterns and challenges , 2010 .

[8]  Elias A. Hadzilias,et al.  A Methodology Framework for Calculating the Cost of e-Government Services , 2005, TCGOV.

[9]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration , 2004, EGOV.

[10]  David Osimo Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? , 2008 .

[11]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  E-Government: The Need for Effective Process Management in the Public Sector , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[12]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Enabling Cross-Organizational Interoperability: A Hybrid e-Business Architecture , 2007, IESA.

[13]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Gregoris Mentzas,et al.  Semantic Integration Of Business Applications Across Collaborative Value Networks , 2007, Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks.

[15]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[16]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to manage information systems interoperability , 2008, Inf. Syst..

[17]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Benchmarking the benefits and barriers of application integration , 2001 .

[18]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Miriam Cunningham,et al.  Collaboration and the knowledge economy : issues, applications, case studies , 2008 .

[20]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Unified Data Modelling and Document Standardization Using Core Components Technical Specification for Electronic Government Applications , 2008, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[21]  Dimitris Askounis,et al.  Meeting the Interoperability Challenges of eTransactions among Heterogeneous Business Partners: The Advantages of Hybrid Architectural Approaches for the Integrating Middleware , 2008, IESA.

[22]  Jörg Ziemann,et al.  Conceiving Interoperability between Public Authorities A Methodical Framework , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[23]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Paving the Way to eGovernment Transformation: Interoperability Registry Infrastructure Development , 2008, EGOV.

[25]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Profiling a decade of Information Systems Frontiers’ research , 2009, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[26]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  e-Gov Research Quality Improvements Since 2003: More Rigor, but Research (Perhaps) Redefined , 2006, EGOV.

[27]  J. Organ,et al.  The Coordination of e-Government in Historical Context , 2003 .

[28]  Sharon S. Dawes An Exploratory Framework for Future E-Government Research Investments , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[29]  Norbert Benamou,et al.  Impact of e-Government Interoperability in Local Governments , 2004, EGOV.

[30]  Nigel P. Rea,et al.  Putting Citizens On-Line, Not in Line , 2001 .

[31]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[33]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Combination of Interoperability Registries with Process and Data Management Tools for Governmental Services Transformation , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  eGovernment Front-End Services: Administrative and Citizen Cost-Benefits , 2008, EGOV.