Verification of probabilistic systems with faulty communication

Many protocols are designed to operate correctly even in the case where the underlying communication medium is faulty. To capture the behavior of such protocols, Lossy Channel Systems (LCS's) have been proposed. In an LCS the communication channels are modeled as unbounded FIFO buffers which are unreliable in the sense that they can nondeterministically lose messages. Recently, several attempts have been made to study Probabilistic Lossy Channel Systems (PLCS's) in which the probability of losing messages is taken into account. In this article, we consider a variant of PLCS's which is more realistic than those studied previously. More precisely, we assume that during each step in the execution of the system, each message may be lost with a certain predefined probability. We show that for such systems the following model-checking problem is decidable: to verify whether a linear-time property definable by a finite-state @w-automaton holds with probability one. We also consider other types of faulty behavior, such as corruption and duplication of messages, and insertion of new messages, and show that the decidability results extend to these models.

[1]  Grégoire Sutre,et al.  An Optimal Automata Approach to LTL Model Checking of Probabilistic Systems , 2003, LPAR.

[2]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Verifying programs with unreliable channels , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[3]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[4]  Graham Higman,et al.  Ordering by Divisibility in Abstract Algebras , 1952 .

[5]  Christel Baier,et al.  Establishing Qualitative Properties for Probabilistic Lossy Channel Systems: An Algorithmic Approach , 1999, ARTS.

[6]  Alexander Moshe Rabinovich Quantitative analysis of probabilistic lossy channel systems , 2006, Inf. Comput..

[7]  S. Purushothaman Iyer,et al.  Probabilistic Lossy Channel Systems , 1997, TAPSOFT.

[8]  Yoshiaki Kakuda,et al.  On Communicating Finite State Machines with Time Constraints for Conformance Testing of Communication Protocols , 1996 .

[9]  J. Esparza,et al.  Model checking probabilistic pushdown automata , 2004, LICS 2004.

[10]  Gregor von Bochmann,et al.  Finite State Description of Communication Protocols , 1978, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Doron A. Peled,et al.  Stutter-Invariant Temporal Properties are Expressible Without the Next-Time Operator , 1997, Inf. Process. Lett..

[12]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  The complexity of probabilistic verification , 1995, JACM.

[13]  Moshe Y. Vardi Automatic verification of probabilistic concurrent finite state programs , 1985, 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985).

[14]  Philippe Schnoebelen,et al.  Verifying lossy channel systems has nonprimitive recursive complexity , 2002, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  Nathalie Bertrand,et al.  Model Checking Lossy Channels Systems Is Probably Decidable , 2003, FoSSaCS.

[16]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Undecidable Verification Problems for Programs with Unreliable Channels , 1996, Inf. Comput..

[17]  J. Van Leeuwen,et al.  Handbook of theoretical computer science - Part A: Algorithms and complexity; Part B: Formal models and semantics , 1990 .

[18]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Verification of Probabilistic Systems with Faulty Communication , 2003, FoSSaCS.

[19]  Alain Finkel,et al.  Unreliable Channels are Easier to Verify Than Perfect Channels , 1996, Inf. Comput..

[20]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Denumerable Markov chains , 1969 .

[21]  Wolfgang Thomas,et al.  Automata on Infinite Objects , 1991, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B: Formal Models and Sematics.

[22]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Reasoning about Probabilistic Lossy Channel Systems , 2000, CONCUR.

[23]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Simulating perfect channels with probabilistic lossy channels , 2005, Inf. Comput..

[24]  Prakash Panangaden,et al.  Measure and probability for concurrency theorists , 2001, Theor. Comput. Sci..