Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T

In order to investigate the merit of high field strength for BOLD-contrast-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, multishot gradient-echo fMRI experiments during motor cortex activation were performed on 1.5- and 4.0-T scanners with equivalent hardware, on the same volunteers. In these studies, artifactual vascular enhancement related to inflow effects was minimized, and large brain areas were covered by using a 3D scan technique. Temporal signal stability was optimized by using spiral readout gradients. The sensitivity for detection of activated regions was assessed by measuring the number of "activated voxels" and their average t score in predefined regions of interest. When comparing fMRI experiments with the same total scan time, performed on six subjects, and with acquisition parameters optimized for each field strength separately, the 4.0-T scanner proved to give superior results, with a 70% greater number of activated voxels and a 20% higher average t score for the activated voxels.

[1]  S G Kim,et al.  Accurate T1 determination from inversion recovery images: Application to human brain at 4 Tesla , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J Vetter,et al.  Whole-body MR imaging and spectroscopy with a 4-T system. , 1988, Radiology.

[3]  S. Ogawa Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation , 1990 .

[4]  J H Duyn,et al.  Steady state effects in fast gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  R S Balaban,et al.  MR relaxation times in human brain: measurement at 4 T. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  E. Haacke,et al.  Identification of vascular structures as a major source of signal contrast in high resolution 2D and 3D functional activation imaging of the motor cortex at l.5T preliminary results , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  F. Barrios,et al.  3‐dimensional functional imaging of human brain using echo‐shifted FLASH MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R S Balaban,et al.  The design and test of a new volume coil for high field imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  R. Ladebeck,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of humans with a 4 t whole‐body magnet , 1990, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Michael Unser,et al.  Multiresolution image registration procedure using spline pyramids , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[11]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Spectroscopy and imaging with a 4 tesla whole‐body mr system , 1988, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[14]  Michael Unser,et al.  Iterative multi-scale registration without landmarks , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  J H Duyn,et al.  Inflow versus deoxyhemoglobin effects in bold functional MRI using gradient echoes at 1.5 T , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Peter van Gelderen,et al.  A comparison of fast MR scan techniques for cerebral activation studies at 1.5 Tesla , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  A. Macovski,et al.  Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding [computerised tomography application]. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[19]  Peter van Gelderen,et al.  Fast 3D functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T with spiral acquisition , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[21]  G H Glover,et al.  Motion Artifacts in fMRI: Comparison of 2DFT with PR and Spiral Scan Methods , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  H. Wen,et al.  Simulation ofB1Field Distribution and Intrinsic Signal-to-Noise in Cardiac MRI as a Function of Static Magnetic Field , 1997 .

[23]  R. Balaban,et al.  Simulation of B1 field distribution and intrinsic signal-to-noise in cardiac MRI as a function of static magnetic field. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[25]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain , 1995 .

[27]  D. Tank,et al.  4 Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation‐induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex , 1993 .