Integrated Testing Strategies for Use in the EU REACH System

Integrated testing strategies have been proposed to facilitate the process of chemicals risk assessment to fulfil the requirements of the proposed EU REACH system. Here, we present individual, decision-tree style, strategies for the eleven major toxicity endpoints of the REACH system, including human health effects and ecotoxicity. These strategies make maximum use of non-animal approaches to hazard identification, before resorting to traditional animal test methods. Each scheme: a) comprises a mixture of validated and non-validated assays (distinguished in the schemes); and b) decision points at key stages to allow the cessation of further testing, should it be possible to use the available information to classify and label and/or undertake risk assessment. The rationale and scientific justification for each of the schemes, with respect to the validation status of the tests involved and their individual advantages and limitations, will be discussed in detail in a series of future publications.

[1]  Joanna Burger.  Differing perspectives on the use of scientific evidence and the precautionary principle , 2003 .

[2]  R. D. Combes,et al.  Comparison of the activation of a carcinogen/ non-carcinogen pair of monoazo dyes using in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays: The use of an ‘in vivo equivalent dose concept’ , 1987 .

[3]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Rethinking the Role of Information in Chemicals Policy: Implications for TSCA and REACH , 2006 .

[4]  C. Eskes,et al.  Alternative (non-Animal) Methods for Cosmetics Testing : Current Status and Future Prospects. A Report Prepared in the Context of the 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive for Establishing the Timetable for Phasing Out Animal Testing , 2005 .

[5]  Munn Sharon j.,et al.  Alternative Approaches Can Reduce the Use of Test Animals under REACH. , 2004 .

[6]  R D Combes,et al.  The use of in vivo-like concentrations of chemicals for validation of in vitro short-term genotoxicity assays--an in vivo equivalent dose concept. , 1987, Mutagenesis.

[7]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Robert D Combes,et al.  Assessing risk to humans from chemical exposure by using non-animal test data. , 2005, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[9]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Guido Persoone,et al.  A practical and user‐friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters , 2003, Environmental toxicology.

[12]  Horst Spielmann,et al.  Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation , 2004, Archives of Toxicology.

[13]  Robert Combes,et al.  Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  C K Atterwill,et al.  BTS working party report on in vitro toxicology , 1997, Human & experimental toxicology.

[15]  Andrew Warmington.  Rhodia looks to the next generation , 2002 .

[16]  Otto Geßner.  Tödliche Vergiftung durch Früchte des Ligusterstrauches (Ligustrum vulgare L.) bei einem 5-jährigen Kinde , 2006, Fühner-Wieland's Sammlung von Vergiftungsfällen.