Residential demolition and its impact on vacant lot hydrology: Implications for the management of stormwater and sewer system overflows

Abstract Increased residential demolitions have made vacant lots a ubiquitous feature of the contemporary urban landscape. Vacant lots may provide ecosystem services such as stormwater runoff capture, but the extent of these functions will be regulated by soil hydrology. We evaluated soil physical and hydrologic characteristics at each of low- (backyard, fenceline) and high-disturbance (within the demolition footprint) positions in 52 vacant lots in Cleveland, OH, which were the result of different eras of demolition process and quality (i.e., pre-1996, post-1996). Penetrometer refusal averaged 56% (range: 15–100%) and was attributed to high concentration of remnant buried debris in anthropogenic backfill soils. Both disturbance level and demolition type significantly regulated infiltration rate to an average of 1.8 cm h −1 (range: 0.03–10.6 cm h −1 ). Sub-surface saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K sat ) averaged higher at 4.0 cm h −1 (range: 0–68.2 cm h −1 ), was influenced by a significant interaction between both disturbance and demolition factors, and controlled by subsurface soil texture and presence/absence of unconsolidated buried debris. Our observations were synthesized in rainfall-runoff models that simulated average, high- and low-hydrologic functioning, turf-dominated, and a prospective green infrastructure simulation, which indicated that although the typical Cleveland vacant lot is a net producer of runoff volume, straightforward change in demolition policy and process, coupled with reutilization as properly designed and managed infiltration-type green infrastructure may result in a vacant lot that has sufficient capacity for detention of the average annual rainfall volume for a major Midwestern US city.

[1]  Pierce H. Jones,et al.  Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate , 2006 .

[2]  B. O'Flaherty,et al.  Abandoned Buildings: A Stochastic Analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Kenneth T. Belt,et al.  The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[4]  A. Semadeni-Davies,et al.  The impacts of climate change and urbanisation on drainage in Helsingborg, Sweden: Combined sewer system , 2008 .

[5]  Anònim Anònim Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[6]  P. Drohan,et al.  Moving beyond the Udorthent—A Proposed Protocol for Assessing Urban Soils to Service Data Needs for Contemporary Urban Ecosystem Management , 2011 .

[7]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[8]  The Impact of Vacant, Tax-Delinquent, and Foreclosed Property on Sales Prices of Neighboring Homes , 2011 .

[9]  G. W. Hamilton,et al.  Infiltration rates on residential lawns in central Pennsylvania , 1999 .

[10]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Urban Stormwater Runoff: A New Class of Environmental Flow Problem , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Anne Power,et al.  Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability? , 2008 .

[12]  Audrey L. Mayer,et al.  Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Building Green Infrastructure via Citizen Participation: A Six-Year Study in the Shepherd Creek (Ohio) , 2012 .

[13]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Population I: , 2020, Biodemography.

[14]  M. Keeley Using Individual Parcel Assessments to Improve Stormwater Management , 2007 .

[15]  G. Bollero,et al.  Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois , 1999 .

[16]  Comparison of the Glover Solution with the Simultaneous- Equations Approach for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity , 1989 .

[17]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field , 2010 .

[18]  Deirdra Stockmann,et al.  Creating a Legal Framework for Urban Agriculture: Lessons from Flint, Michigan , 2010 .

[19]  R. Scalenghe,et al.  The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas , 2009 .