Diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology

The aim of this investigation was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of conventional effusion cytology. Cytological diagnoses of 300 pleural effusions and 300 ascites were compared with clinical and/or histological follow‐ups of the respective patients. Sensitivity of our cytological diagnoses on pleural effusions was 50.0%, specificity 97.0%, positive predictive value 95.7%, and negative predictive value 86.4%. Sensitivity in ascitic effusions was 62.4%, specificity 98.0%, positive predictive value 100.0%, and negative predictive value 88.3%; 5.8% of diagnoses for pleural and 4.4% for peritoneal effusions were suspicious or doubtful. The overall false‐positive rate was 0.5%, while the false‐negative rate was 31.5%. False‐negative results were due to sampling errors in 71% of pleural and 73% of peritoneal effusions and to screening errors in 29% and 27%, respectively. Our data and those from the literature show that diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology is still unsatisfactory and should be improved. Therefore, the use of different adjuvant methods is recommended. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1999;20:350–357. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  F. Askin,et al.  Diagnostic efficacy of pleural biopsy as compared with that of pleural fluid examination. , 1991, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[2]  D. Häussinger,et al.  Static DNA cytometry as a diagnostic aid in effusion cytology: II. DNA aneuploidy for identification of neoplastic cells in equivocal effusions. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[3]  L. Kapusta,et al.  The role of DNA flow and image cytometry in the evaluation of body cavity fluids. , 1991, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[4]  A. Böcking.  Standardisierte Befund- erstellung in der extragenitalen Zytologie , 1998, Der Pathologe.

[5]  I. Taylor,et al.  Measurement of cellular DNA content as an adjunct to diagnostic cytology in malignant effusions. , 1984, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[6]  W. Kwee,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative differences between benign and malignant mesothelial cells in pleural fluid. , 1982, Acta cytologica.

[7]  M. Pinto.  CA-15.3 assay in effusions: comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen and CA-125 assay and cytologic diagnosis. , 1996, Acta cytologica.

[8]  A. Krishan,et al.  Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy in diffuse malignant mesothelioma. , 1995, Cytometry.

[9]  S. Knuutila,et al.  Comparison of DNA and karyotype ploidy in malignant mesothelioma. , 1992, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[10]  I. Casagranda,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis and chromosome analysis: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive value in malignant and benign pleural effusions. , 1990, Pathologica.

[11]  W. Kwee,et al.  Qualitative distinctive differences between the vacuoles of mesothelioma cells and of cells from metastatic carcinoma exfoliated in pleural fluid. , 1984, Acta cytologica.

[12]  G. Annoni,et al.  Utility of ascitic fluid analysis in patients with malignancy-related ascites. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  S. Freni,et al.  Tumor diagnosis in pleural and ascitic effusions based on DNA cytophotometry. , 1971, Acta cytologica.

[14]  V. Skaug,et al.  Karyotypic changes in the preclinical and subsequent stages of malignant mesothelioma: a case report. , 1993, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[15]  L. Kobzik,et al.  The distinction of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in malignant effusions by electron microscopy. , 1985, Acta cytologica.

[16]  A. Hjerpe,et al.  Prognostic importance of the DNA ploidy pattern in malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. , 1992, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[17]  K. Müller,et al.  Static DNA cytometry as a diagnostic aid in effusion cytology: I. DNA aneuploidy for identification and differentiation of primary and secondary tumors of the serous membranes. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[18]  Johnson Wd.  The cytological diagnosis of cancer in serous effusions. , 1966 .

[19]  M. Shamoto,et al.  Comparative studies of the same adenocarcinoma cells, macrophages, and mesothelial cells by light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[20]  L. Koss.  Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases , 1968 .

[21]  G. Bahr,et al.  Cytophotometric determination of DNA in mesotheliomas and reactive mesothelial cells. , 1988, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[22]  A. I. Spriggs,et al.  Atlas of Serous Fluid Cytopathology: A Guide to the Cells of Pleural, Pericardial, Peritoneal and Hydrocele Fluids , 1989 .

[23]  R. Braylan,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis and cytopathology of body cavity fluids. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[24]  Á. Panizo,et al.  Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope's needle. Study of 414 patients. , 1990 .

[25]  F. R. Panadero,et al.  Correlación de la sensibilidad del estudio citogenético y citológico con los hallazgos toracoscópicos en el estudio de derrames pleurales malignos , 1995 .

[26]  L. Koss,et al.  Flow cytometry and feulgen cytophotometry in evaluation of effusions , 1987, Cancer.