New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as a method for inducing reversible lesions in neurologically normal observers ("virtual lesions"). However, there is evidence that the behavioral and perceptual effects of TMS are too subtle to fit neatly into such a conceptualization. The objective of this commentary is to address some of the behavioral and perceptual consequences of TMS and to propose a novel mechanism by which TMS influences behavior. The approach presented here allows differential stimulation of functionally distinct neural populations and thus enables TMS studies not only to investigate the necessity of cortical regions, but also the neural processes that underlie that necessity.

[1]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Y. Ejima,et al.  Estimation of the Timing of Human Visual Perception from Magnetoencephalography , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Giorgio Fuggetta,et al.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activities induced by varying single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity over the left primary motor area: A combined EEG and TMS study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[7]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Michael Erb,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  D. Braun,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[13]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  F. M. Mottaghy,et al.  Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke’s area , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.