Simulation-based modeling of wild blueberry pollination

Abstract The high variability of wild (lowbush) blueberry plants in spatial and genetic structure, in combination with bee foraging behavior varying between species, and the complexity of these factors interacting over time and space, are major obstacles to understanding of pollination dynamics subject to environmental change. The bottom-up modeling paradigm provides an ideal approach to bridging the gap between known mechanisms of individual organisms and unknown spatial–temporal dynamics of pollination at the field scale. By linking empirical data to stochastically-based ecological process modeling, we present a spatially-explicit agent-based simulation model that enables exploration of how various factors, including plant spatial arrangements, outcrossing and self-pollination, bee species compositions and weather conditions, in isolation and combination, affect pollination efficiency throughout a blueberry bloom season. The firmly validated open-source model is a useful tool for hypothesis testing and theory development for wild blueberry pollination researches. Sensitivity analysis suggested that fruit set and resulting measures of productivity such as fruit mass and viable seeds per fruit were sensitive to parameterization of blueberry genotype or clone size and the amount of blueberry plant cover in a field. Fruit set due to pollen compatibility was sensitive to ovule number per flower and foraging bee density. Simulation experiments allowed us to compare bee pollination efficiencies at the bee taxon population level (honey bees, bumble bees, and native solitary bees), the effect of foraging distance from bee nest or colony site on fruit set, and test whether the mechanism of gametophytic self-incompatibility (pre- vs. post-zygotic decision making by the plant) in wild blueberry pollination at the field level matters in estimating yield.

[1]  F. Drummond,et al.  A global review of arthropod-mediated ecosystem-services in Vaccinium berry agroecosystems , 2014 .

[2]  V. Nams,et al.  Honey bee stocking numbers and wild blueberry production in Nova Scotia , 2012, Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

[3]  Mickaël Henry,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in honeybee foraging activity reveals optimal focus scale for predicting agro-environmental scheme efficiency , 2012 .

[4]  A. Covich,et al.  Nutrient Enrichment Affects Immature Mosquito Abundance and Species Composition in Field-Based Mesocosms in the Coastal Plain of Georgia , 2014, Environmental entomology.

[5]  Benoit Gaudou,et al.  GAMA 1.6: Advancing the Art of Complex Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2013, PRIMA.

[6]  N. Boyd,et al.  Growing Degree-day Models for Predicting Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) Ramet Emergence, Tip Dieback, and Flowering in Nova Scotia, Canada , 2012 .

[7]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[8]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Predicting Flower Phenology and Viability of Highbush Blueberry , 2012 .

[9]  F. Drummond,et al.  Maine wild blueberry systems analysis , 2017 .

[10]  F. Drummond Behavior of Bees Associated with the Wild Blueberry Agro-ecosystem in the USA , 2016 .

[11]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size , 2007, Oecologia.

[12]  Patrick Hiesl,et al.  The effect of hardwood component on grapple skidder and stroke delimber idle time and productivity - An agent based model , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[13]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Parameterization of the InVEST Crop Pollination Model to spatially predict abundance of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) native bee pollinators in Maine, USA , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Dawn Cassandra Parker,et al.  Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: Challenges and prospects , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  S. Rands,et al.  Effects of pollinator density-dependent preferences on field margin visitations in the midst of agricultural monocultures: A modelling approach , 2010 .

[16]  D. Hiebeler,et al.  Grid-Set-Match, an agent-based simulation model, predicts fruit set for the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) agroecosystem , 2017 .

[17]  F. Drummond,et al.  Abundance and Diversity of Wild Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Found in Lowbush Blueberry Growing Regions of Downeast Maine , 2015, Environmental entomology.

[18]  F. Drummond,et al.  TB203: Recent Advances in the Biology and Genetics of Lowbush Blueberry , 2009 .

[19]  K. MacKenzie,et al.  Comparative Pollination Effectiveness Among Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on Lowbush Blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium angustifolium) , 2002 .

[20]  E. Asare,et al.  Economic Risk of Bee Pollination in Maine Wild Blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium , 2017, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[21]  F. Drummond,et al.  Andrena spp. Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Nesting Density in Lowbush Blueberry Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton (Ericales: Ericaceae) Influenced by Management Practices , 2017, Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society.

[22]  E. Asare,et al.  Grower perceptions of native pollinators and pollination strategies in the lowbush blueberry industry , 2013, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[23]  K. Delaplane,et al.  Crop Pollination by Bees , 2000 .

[24]  J. Stommel,et al.  Yield Variation among Clones of Lowbush Blueberry as a Function of Genetic Similarity and Self-compatibility , 2010 .

[25]  Christine Carrière Creating a decision support model for wild blueberry production returns and pollination services , 2014 .

[26]  Hongchun Qu,et al.  A spatially explicit agent-based simulation platform for investigating effects of shared pollination service on ecological communities , 2013, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[28]  Philippe Aras,et al.  Effect of a honey bee (Hymenoptera : Apidae) gradient on the pollination and yield of lowbush blueberry , 1996 .