Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND Pump thrombosis remains an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). A perceived increase in the incidence of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) by clinicians prompted this analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database. METHODS Between 2006 and June 2013, 8,988 United States patients aged older than 18 years received a durable LVAD. Of these, 6,910 adult patients from 132 institutions who received a HMII LVAD were entered in the INTERMACS database and constitute the study group for this analysis. RESULTS Overall survival (with censoring at transplant or explant for recovery) with the HMII LVAD was 80% at 1 year and 69% at 2 years and was not significantly different when stratified by era of implant. Freedom from device exchange or death due to thrombosis decreased from 99% at 6 months in 2009 to 94% in 2012 (p < 0.0001). Multivariable hazard function analysis showed risk factors for pump thrombosis included later implant year (p < 0.0001), younger age (p < 0.0001), higher creatinine (p = 0.002), larger body mass index (p = 0.004), white race (p = 0.0004), left ventricular ejection fraction above 20% (p = 0.02), and higher lactate dehydrogenase level at 1 month (p < 0.0001). Survival (p < 0.0001) and freedom from infection (p = 0.008) and cerebrovascular accident (p < 0.0001) were lower after pump exchange than after primary implant. CONCLUSIONS Pump exchange or death due to pump thrombosis increased during 2011 and 2012, but the magnitude of the increase remained relatively small. Survival remains high (80% at 1 year) with the HMII LVAD. Risk factor analysis suggests that a number of patient-related factors contribute to the risk of thrombosis. Markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase in the first month is a predictor of pump thrombosis. This analysis could not examine the potential role of technical factors during implant, such as sub-optimal pump or graft positioning, changes in patient management paradigms with pump speed settings, improved recognition and change in the threshold for pump exchange, or design or production changes with the pump, as contributors to the risk of pump thrombosis.

[1]  J. Oh,et al.  Role of echocardiography in patients with intravascular hemolysis due to suspected continuous-flow LVAD thrombosis. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States. , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  Karen Ulisney,et al.  INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  Eugene H Blackstone,et al.  Major bleeding during HeartMate II support. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Nader Moazami,et al.  Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Kushwaha,et al.  Case report - Cardiac general Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy for a year or more in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices , 2010 .

[7]  M. Drazner,et al.  Utilization of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of left ventricular assist device thrombosis. , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[8]  S. Raman,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular assist devices with cardiovascular computed tomography and impact on management. , 2010, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[9]  Erik Swyngedouw,et al.  First Annual Report , 1985 .

[10]  R. Autschbach,et al.  Low stroke rate and few thrombo-embolic events after HeartMate II implantation under mild anticoagulation. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  S. Russell,et al.  Algorithm for the diagnosis and management of suspected pump thrombus. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  V. Mehta,et al.  Diagnosis of hemolysis and device thrombosis with lactate dehydrogenase during left ventricular assist device support. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  Lynn M. Wilson,et al.  Surgical technique influences HeartMate II left ventricular assist device thrombosis. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  F. Pagani,et al.  Gastrointestinal bleeding and subsequent risk of thromboembolic events during support with a left ventricular assist device. , 2012, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[15]  Karen Ulisney,et al.  INTERMACS database for durable devices for circulatory support: first annual report. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  Nir Uriel,et al.  Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  K. Muthiah,et al.  Thrombolysis for suspected intrapump thrombosis in patients with continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist device. , 2013, Artificial organs.

[18]  N. Smedira,et al.  Pump replacement for left ventricular assist device failure can be done safely and is associated with low mortality. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  Marissa Miller,et al.  Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation? , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  Chad E. Eckert,et al.  Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  L. Miller,et al.  Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  Robert L Kormos,et al.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[23]  S. Kushwaha,et al.  Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy for a year or more in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. , 2010, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[24]  N. Uriel,et al.  Prevalence and timing of bend relief disconnection in patients supported by the late version HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.