Invariance Properties of Quantifiers and Multiagent Information Exchange

The paper presents two case studies of multi-agent information exchange involving generalized quantifiers. We focus on scenarios in which agents successfully converge to knowledge on the basis of the information about the knowledge of others, so-called Muddy Children puzzle [1] and Top Hat puzzle. We investigate the relationship between certain invariance properties of quantifiers and the successful convergence to knowledge in such situations. We generalize the scenarios to account for public announcements with arbitrary quantifiers. We show that the Muddy Children puzzle is solvable for any number of agents if and only if the quantifier in the announcement is positively active (satisfies a version of the variety condition). In order to get the characterization result, we propose a new concise logical modeling of the puzzle based on the number triangle representation of generalized quantifiers. In a similar vein, we also study the Top Hat puzzle. We observe that in this case an announcement needs to satisfy stronger conditions in order to guarantee solvability. Hence, we introduce a new property, called bounded thickness, and show that the solvability of the Top Hat puzzle for arbitrary number of agents is equivalent to the announcement being 1-thick.

[1]  J. C. Burkill,et al.  A mathematician's miscellany , 1954 .

[2]  Dana Angluin,et al.  Finding Patterns Common to a Set of Strings , 1980, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[3]  Jakub Szymanik,et al.  Computational complexity of polyadic lifts of generalized quantifiers in natural language , 2010 .

[4]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Quantifiers in language and logic , 2006 .

[5]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[6]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  On the Expressive Power of Monotone Natural Language Quantifiers over Finite Models , 2002, J. Philos. Log..

[7]  J. Benthem Essays in Logical Semantics , 1986 .

[8]  Nina Gierasimczuk,et al.  The Problem of Learning the Semantics of Quantifiers , 2007, TbiLLC.

[9]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  Questions About Quantifiers , 1984, J. Symb. Log..

[10]  A. Mostowski On a generalization of quantifiers , 1957 .

[11]  Wiebe van der Hoek,et al.  Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Knowledge Puzzles , 2007, ICCS.

[12]  Jelle Gerbrandy,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic , 1998 .

[13]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Logic, Language and Computation , 1997 .

[14]  Nina Gierasimczuk,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Knowing one ' s limits : logical analysis of inductive inference , 2010 .

[15]  Kevin T. Kelly The Logic of Reliable Inquiry , 1996 .

[16]  Nina Gierasimczuk,et al.  A note on a generalization of the Muddy Children puzzle , 2011, TARK XIII.

[17]  Carl Smith Review of Systems that Learn (second edition) by Jain, Osherson, Royer, Sharma , 2000, SIGA.

[18]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[19]  K. R. Apt Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK-2011), Groningen, The Netherlands, July 12-14, 2011 , 2011, TARK.

[20]  Nina Gierasimczuk Identification through Inductive Verification , 2007, TbiLLC.

[21]  Nina Gierasimczuk,et al.  Finite identification from the viewpoint of epistemic update , 2011, Inf. Comput..

[22]  Hans Joerg Tiede,et al.  Identifiability in the Limit of Context-Free Generalized Quantifiers , 1999 .