Keeping it pure – a pedagogical case study of teaching soft systems methodology in scenario and policy analysis

Purpose Soft systems methodology (SSM) is well documented in the academic and management literature. Over the last 40 years, the methodology has come to be adapted depending on the tool users’ skills and experience in order to fit the problem. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate good teaching and learning practice from a pedagogical perspective. Design/methodology/approach Dr Ian Yeoman of Victoria University of Wellington provides a personal reflection of how the methodology is used in the teaching and learning of TOUR301 Tourism Policy and Planning as a policy and scenario analysis method. Findings The paper articulates the seven stages of SSM from problem situation unstructured, through to Rich Pictures, vision and guiding principles, policy solutions, comparisons, feasibility and implementation stages. The paper uses a series of teaching tasks to breakdown the complexity of the methodology thus guiding students and teachers in how to deploy the methodology in the classroom. Originality/value The value of the paper demonstrates the reflective practice of SSM in action as an exemplar of good practice. The paper clearly articulates the stages of the methodology so students and teachers can adopt this approach in classroom environments following a scaffolding learning approach. The use of teaching tasks throughout the paper helps bring clarity and order thus enabling the teacher to effectively teach the subject and the students to learn. The most significant contribution of this paper is the articulation of good teaching practice in policy and scenario analysis which articulated through four learning lessons: facilitating a learning environment; the impact of visual thinking; political theory; the importance of incremental learning; and problem-based learning and international students.

[1]  John Mingers,et al.  An Idea Ahead of Its Time: The History and Development of Soft Systems Methodology , 2000 .

[2]  Graham H. May The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios , 2003 .

[3]  M. Mcclure The Wonder Country: Making New Zealand Tourism , 2004 .

[4]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[5]  I. Yeoman,et al.  Scottish tourism: Scenarios and vision , 2005 .

[6]  D. Pearce Frameworks for Tourism Research , 2012 .

[7]  I. Yeoman,et al.  Foot-and-mouth disease: A scenario of reoccurrence for Scotland’s tourism industry , 2005 .

[8]  I. Yeoman Authentic Learning: My Reflective Journey With Postgraduates , 2012 .

[9]  R. Haber How we remember what we see. , 1970, Scientific American.

[10]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  Visioning the Pathway:: A Leadership Process Model , 2005 .

[11]  David E. Avison,et al.  Towards an SSM toolkit: rich picture diagramming , 1992 .

[12]  S. Doorne Power, participation and perception: an insider's perspective on the politics of the Wellington waterfront redevelopment. , 1998 .

[13]  U. McMahon-Beattie,et al.  Keeping it pure: could New Zealand be an eco paradise? , 2015 .

[14]  Mark Korduba Problem solving and decision making , 2012 .

[15]  George Wright,et al.  The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios , 2002 .

[16]  David Kirk,et al.  Hard and soft systems , 1995 .

[17]  I. Yeoman,et al.  Signals and Signposts of the Future: Literary Festival Consumption in 2050 , 2014 .

[18]  M. Lubell Collaborative Institutions, Belief-Systems, and Perceived Policy Effectiveness , 2003 .

[19]  Rong Huang Chinese international students' perceptions of the problem-based learning experience. , 2005 .

[20]  Dianne Dredge,et al.  Tourism Planning and Policy , 2006 .

[21]  U. McMahon-Beattie,et al.  New Zealand Tourism: Which Direction Would it Take? , 2014 .

[22]  U. McMahon-Beattie,et al.  Oil Depletion: What does this mean for Scottish tourism? , 2007 .