Unpacking construction site digitalization: the role of incongruence and inconsistency in technological frames

Construction site operations often involve multiple actors with substantial variations in assumptions, expectations, and knowledge about technology. This could impair digitalization, which involves...

[1]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Elizabeth Davidson,et al.  26 MAKING SENSE OF TECHNOLOGICAL FRAMES: Promise, Progress, and Potential , 2005 .

[3]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[4]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study , 2020, Construction Management and Economics.

[5]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[6]  Changyoon Kim,et al.  On-site construction management using mobile computing technology , 2013 .

[7]  Ka Chi Lam,et al.  The application of the ant colony optimization algorithm to the construction site layout planning problem , 2007 .

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[11]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, 1st Edition , 2014 .

[12]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Bethan Morgan.  Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: the case of a design firm , 2019 .

[14]  Fred Sherratt,et al.  UK construction site safety: discourses of enforcement and engagement , 2013 .

[15]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  From visions to practice – The role of sensemaking, institutional logic and pragmatic practice , 2017 .

[18]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[19]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  The Logic of Innovation in Construction , 2014 .

[20]  Rita Lavikka,et al.  Digital disruption of the AEC industry: technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths , 2018, Construction Management and Economics.

[21]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Four-dimensional visualization of construction scheduling and site utilization , 2004 .

[22]  Marianne Törner,et al.  The leadership practices of construction site managers and their influence on occupational safety: an observational study of transformational and passive/avoidant leadership , 2018, Construction Management and Economics.

[23]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digitization and Phase Transitions in Platform Organizing Logics: Evidence from the Process Automation Industry , 2020, MIS Q..

[25]  Lena E. Bygballe,et al.  Collaborative Project Delivery Models and the Role of Routines in Institutionalizing Partnering , 2019, Project Management Journal.

[26]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation , 2018, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation , 2020, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Karin Olesen,et al.  Implications of dominant technological frames over a longitudinal period , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  How Digital Information Transforms Project Delivery Models , 2019, Project Management Journal.

[30]  André Borrmann,et al.  Combining inverse photogrammetry and BIM for automated labeling of construction site images for machine learning , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[31]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[32]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[33]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[34]  E. Davidson.  A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[36]  D. Steinhardt,et al.  The structure of emergent prefabricated housing industries: a comparative case study of Australia and Sweden , 2019, Construction Management and Economics.

[37]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[38]  J. Holmström,et al.  Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation , 2017 .

[39]  M. Barrett.  Challenges of EDI adoption for electronic trading in the London Insurance Market , 1999 .

[40]  Daniel Nylén,et al.  Cycles of Innovation and Alignment in Digital Transformation: Investigating the Dynamics of Resource Recombination in a Construction Firm , 2020, HICSS.

[41]  Viktoria Sundquist,et al.  Renewal in construction projects: tracing effects of client requirements , 2016 .

[42]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study , 2010 .

[43]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Inconsistent and Incongruent Frames During IT-enabled Change: An Action Research Study into Sales Process Innovation , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  E Papadonikolaki,et al.  Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM , 2017 .

[45]  Chris Harty,et al.  Diffusion of digital innovation in construction: a case study of a UK engineering firm , 2015 .

[46]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[47]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[48]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[49]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  The role of industry: an analytical framework to understand ICT transformation within the AEC industry , 2017 .

[50]  Kylie Sayer.  Denying the Technology: Middle Management Resistance in Business Process Re-Engineering , 1998 .