Locally produced textiles: product development and evaluation of consumers’ acceptance

Textile and apparel represent one of the most globalised industries which can have negative impacts on the environment and social equity. This research used locally grown natural materials, including sheep's wool, mohair, and plant-sourced natural dyes, from a university campus and surrounding areas to develop textiles. The study demonstrated that local production can be a sustainable development strategy with economic, environmental, and social benefits. Focus group discussions and a questionnaire survey were conducted with university students to evaluate the users’ acceptance of the locally produced textiles. A majority of the participants liked the colours of the textiles, thought the textile yarns and scarf made from local materials were beautiful and comfortable, and were willing to buy the locally produced textile products. Students’ sustainability attitudes towards equity, economy, and environment affected their preference for locally produced textiles. Their interest in campus-sourced products was mainly driven by their personal connection with the university.

[1]  Huantian Cao,et al.  Quest for the eco‐apparel market: a study of mothers' willingness to purchase organic cotton clothing for their children , 2010 .

[2]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[3]  Mohammad Shahid,et al.  Recent advancements in natural dye applications: a review , 2013 .

[4]  L. Kletzer.  Globalization and job loss, from manufacturing to services , 2005 .

[5]  Mohammad Mirjalili,et al.  Eco-friendly dyeing of wool using natural dye from weld as co-partner with synthetic dye , 2011 .

[6]  Laura Mørch Andersen,et al.  The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared , 2008 .

[7]  D. Cooke,et al.  Dyes from plants: Past usage, present understanding and potential , 2001, Plant Growth Regulation.

[8]  Julie Zimmerman,et al.  Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  L. Zepeda,et al.  Consumers' Views on Local Food , 2004 .

[10]  F. Spina,et al.  Decolourisation and detoxification in the fungal treatment of textile wastewaters from dyeing processes. , 2011, New biotechnology.

[11]  H. Peterson,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Wool Products in the United States , 2012 .

[12]  Rattanaphol Mongkholrattanasit,et al.  Dyeing and fastness properties of natural dyes extracted from eucalyptus leaves using padding techniques , 2010 .

[13]  William McDonough,et al.  Design for the Triple Top Line: New Tools for Sustainable Commerce , 2002 .

[14]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Susanne Geissler,et al.  Natural dyes in modern textile dyehouses — how to combine experiences of two centuries to meet the demands of the future? , 2003 .

[16]  Stephen M. Burkinshaw,et al.  The mordant dyeing of wool using tannic acid and FeSO4, Part 1: Initial findings , 2009 .

[17]  Carlos E. Carpio,et al.  Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina , 2009 .

[18]  John C. Bernard,et al.  Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: the influence of labelling for fibre origin and production methods , 2008 .

[19]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Padma S. Vankar,et al.  Ultrasonic dyeing of cotton fabric with aqueous extract of Eclipta alba , 2007 .

[21]  Stuart Walker,et al.  Making design work – Sustainability, Product Design and Social Equity , 2001 .