Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face-selectivity in the fusiform gyrus

A fundamental assumption in neuroscience is that brain structure determines function. Accordingly, functionally distinct regions of cortex should be structurally distinct in their connections to other areas. We tested this hypothesis in relation to face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus. By using only structural connectivity, as measured through diffusion-weighted imaging, we were able to predict functional activation to faces in the fusiform gyrus. These predictions outperformed two control models and a standard group-average benchmark. The structure–function relationship discovered from the initial participants was highly robust in predicting activation in a second group of participants, despite differences in acquisition parameters and stimuli. This approach can thus reliably estimate activation in participants who cannot perform functional imaging tasks and is an alternative to group-activation maps. Additionally, we identified cortical regions whose connectivity was highly influential in predicting face selectivity within the fusiform, suggesting a possible mechanistic architecture underlying face processing in humans.

[1]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Clustered organization of cortical connectivity , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[3]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Patches with Links: A Unified System for Processing Faces in the Macaque Temporal Lobe , 2008, Science.

[4]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[5]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  D. Pandya,et al.  Parietal, temporal, and occipita projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: A retrograde tracer study , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[10]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[11]  Polina Golland,et al.  Permutation Tests for Classification: Towards Statistical Significance in Image-Based Studies , 2003, IPMI.

[12]  D. Pandya,et al.  Prelunate, occipitotemporal, and parahippocampal projections to the basis pontis in rhesus monkey , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Reduced structural connectivity in ventral visual cortex in congenital prosopagnosia , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Are Unilateral Right Posterior Cerebral Lesions Sufficient to Cause Prosopagnosia? Clinical and Radiological Findings in Six Additional Patients , 1986, Cortex.

[15]  H. Johansen-Berg,et al.  Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Comparison of fiber tracts derived from in-vivo DTI tractography with 3D histological neural tract tracer reconstruction on a macaque brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Guérit,et al.  The temporal lobe and the limbic system, P. Gloor (Ed.). Oxford University Press (1997), 865 , 2000 .

[18]  D. Pandya,et al.  Course of the fiber pathways to pons from parasensory association areas in the rhesus monkey , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  Russell A. Epstein Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Detection of cortical thickness correlates of cognitive performance: Reliability across MRI scan sessions, scanners, and field strengths , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Patches of face-selective cortex in the macaque frontal lobe , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Visual pontocerebellar projections in the macaque , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[28]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  Brain Functional Localization: A Survey of Image Registration Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[33]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Accurate prediction of V1 location from cortical folds in a surface coordinate system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[35]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[36]  T. V. Sewards Neural structures and mechanisms involved in scene recognition: A review and interpretation , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  J. Franklin,et al.  The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction , 2005 .

[42]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[45]  Ann Allergy,et al.  O R I G I N a L a R T I C L E S , 2022 .

[46]  A W Toga,et al.  Localization of the human cortical visual area MT based on computer aided histological analysis. , 2005, Cerebral Cortex.

[47]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[48]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[50]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Occipito-temporal connections in the human brain. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.