Detecting short-duration ambulatory episodes in Fitbit® data

Wearable consumer physical activity tracking devices (such as Fitbit®) which generate logs of step count data for users offer a simple and relatively inexpensive way to monitor ambulatory behaviour. However, for researchers, the time granularity with which incremental step count data can typically be obtained using these devices, limits their usefulness particularly for short duration events. This prevents wider use of consumer wearables for non-fitness related purposes, such as using step counts to describe specific activities of daily living. This paper describes a method to overcome this limitation by classifying movements based on patterns in the data. We propose a simple model for analysing adjacent step count data values to achieve this using pilot data on physical activity in an office setting.

[1]  Tim Olds,et al.  The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[2]  D. Dunstan,et al.  The sedentary office : a growing case for change towards better health and productivity Expert statement commissioned by Public Health England and Active Working C.I.C. , 2015 .

[3]  Leon Straker,et al.  Sedentary work. Evidence on an emergent work health and safety issue , 2016 .

[4]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Abstract MP11: Fitbit: An Accurate and Reliable Device for Wireless Physical Activity Tracking , 2015 .

[5]  Charlotte L Edwardson,et al.  Office Workers' Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity During and Outside Working Hours , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  Genevieve N Healy,et al.  Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[7]  C. Matthews,et al.  Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  Leon Straker,et al.  The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[9]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  Gregory M Dominick,et al.  Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[11]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  T. Gorely,et al.  Epoch length and its effect on physical activity intensity. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Nicolas Farina,et al.  The Validity of Consumer-Level Activity Monitors in Healthy Older Adults in Free-Living Conditions. , 2018, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[16]  K. Volpp,et al.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. , 2015, JAMA.

[17]  U. Wisløff,et al.  Accuracy of Heart Rate Watches: Implications for Weight Management , 2016, PloS one.