Spatio-temporal population dynamics of six phytoplankton taxa

Studying aquatic population dynamics using spatio-temporal monitoring data is associated with a number of challenges and choices. One can let several samples represent the same population over larger areas, or alternatively model the dynamics of each sampling location in continuous space. We analysed the spatio-temporal population dynamics of six phytoplankton taxa in the Baltic Sea applying multivariate state-space models with first-order density dependence. We compared three spatial scales and three models for spatial correlation between predefined subpopulations using information theoretic model selection. We hypothesised that populations close to each other display similar dynamic properties and spatial synchrony decreasing with the distance. We further hypothesize that intermediate-scale grouping of data into subpopulations may parsimoniously represent such dynamics. All taxa showed constant density dependence across space and strong spatial synchrony, consistently requiring a parameter for spatial correlation whenever models included several population states. The most parsimonious spatial structure varied between taxa, most often being one panmictic population or ten intercorrelated population states. Evidently, longer time-series, containing more information, provide more options for modelling detailed spatio-temporal patterns. With a few decade-long plankton time-series data, we encourage determining the appropriate spatial scale on biological grounds rather than model fit.

[1]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  The statistical analysis of the Canadian Lynx cycle. , 1953 .

[2]  E. Stewart,et al.  Subsurface patch of a dinoflagellate (Ceratium tripos) off Southern California: Patch length, growth rate, associated vertically migrating species , 1984 .

[3]  E. Bauerfeind,et al.  Application of Laser Doppler Spectroscopy (LDS) in determining swimming velocities of motile phytoplankton , 1986 .

[4]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Population Regulation" Old Arguments and a New Synthesis , 1995 .

[5]  Jan Lindström,et al.  The Moran effect and synchrony in population dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  E. Ranta,et al.  Spatially autocorrelated disturbances and patterns in population synchrony , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods , 2001 .

[8]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[9]  M. Peruggia.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[10]  G. Hallfors.  Checklist of Baltic Sea Phytoplankton Species (including some heterotrophic protistan groups) , 2004 .

[11]  S. Engen,et al.  Generalizations of the Moran Effect Explaining Spatial Synchrony in Population Fluctuations , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[12]  James H. Brown,et al.  Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[13]  K. Johannesson,et al.  Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea. , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[14]  R. De Wit,et al.  'Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects'; what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? , 2006, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The extended Moran effect and large-scale synchronous fluctuations in the size of great tit and blue tit populations. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  M. Laamanen,et al.  Long-term changes in summer phytoplankton communities of the open northern Baltic Sea , 2007 .

[17]  Elizabeth E. Holmes,et al.  Using multivariate state-space models to study spatial structure and dynamics , 2008 .

[18]  Jonas Knape,et al.  ESTIMABILITY OF DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN MODELS OF TIME SERIES DATA. , 2008, Ecology.

[19]  Jonas Knape,et al.  Estimating environmental effects on population dynamics: consequences of observation error , 2009 .

[20]  K. Myrberg,et al.  Physical Oceanography of the Baltic Sea , 2009 .

[21]  Brian Dennis,et al.  A better way to estimate population trends , 2009 .

[22]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Replicated sampling increases efficiency in monitoring biological populations. , 2010, Ecology.

[23]  Elizabeth E. Holmes,et al.  Inferring spatial structure from time‐series data: using multivariate state‐space models to detect metapopulation structure of California sea lions in the Gulf of California, Mexico , 2010 .

[24]  K. Kaljurand,et al.  Changes in phytoplankton communities along a north–south gradient in the Baltic Sea between 1990 and 2008 , 2011 .

[25]  J. Tuimala,et al.  Long-term trends in phytoplankton composition in the western and central Baltic Sea , 2011 .

[26]  Elizabeth E. Holmes,et al.  MARSS: Multivariate Autoregressive State-space Models for Analyzing Time-series Data , 2012, R J..

[27]  James Durbin,et al.  Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods: Second Edition , 2012 .

[28]  Eric J Ward,et al.  Quantifying effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on community dynamics with multivariate autoregressive (MAR) models. , 2013, Ecology.

[29]  L. Kautsky,et al.  Genetic biodiversity in the Baltic Sea: species-specific patterns challenge management , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[30]  P. Turchin.  Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis , 2013 .

[31]  S. Hampton,et al.  Inferring plankton community structure from marine and freshwater long‐term data using multivariate autoregressive models , 2013 .

[32]  S. Lehtinen,et al.  Harmonizing large data sets reveals novel patterns in the Baltic sea phytoplankton community structure , 2013 .

[33]  S. Lehtinen,et al.  Climate Change and Eutrophication Induced Shifts in Northern Summer Plankton Communities , 2013, PloS one.

[34]  John C. Nash,et al.  A Replacement and Extension of the optim() Function , 2014 .

[35]  Jun Sun,et al.  Increasing the quality, comparability and accessibility of phytoplankton species composition time-series data , 2015 .

[36]  A. Godhe,et al.  Local adaptation and oceanographic connectivity patterns explain genetic differentiation of a marine diatom across the North Sea–Baltic Sea salinity gradient , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[37]  Mark A. Lewis,et al.  State-space models’ dirty little secrets: even simple linear Gaussian models can have estimation problems , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[38]  L. Uusitalo,et al.  Approach for Supporting Food Web Assessments with Multi-Decadal Phytoplankton Community Analyses—Case Baltic Sea , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[39]  L. Uusitalo,et al.  A retrospective view of the development of the Gulf of Bothnia ecosystem , 2017 .

[40]  Gregory D. Williams,et al.  Population assessment using multivariate time‐series analysis: A case study of rockfishes in Puget Sound , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[41]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Long‐term temporal and spatial trends in eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  E. Andrén,et al.  Why is the Baltic Sea so special to live in , 2017 .

[43]  D. Reuman,et al.  A global geography of synchrony for marine phytoplankton , 2017 .

[44]  Kohske Takahashi,et al.  Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics [R package ggplot2 version 3.3.2] , 2020 .