Process of innovation knowledge increase in supply chain network from the perspective of sustainable development

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to extend prior supply chain research by describing the process of innovation knowledge increase in supply chain network. More specifically, this study investigates the role of network density, and views the knowledge increase as the process of knowledge diffusion and knowledge innovation. Design/methodology/approach A multi-agent model, which demonstrates the process of knowledge increase in supply chain network, was established, and simulated by using NetLogo simulation platform. Findings The results indicate that the network density will promote the knowledge increase of the supply chain when it is high or low. In the meantime, these results show that the inhibition of knowledge diffusion and knowledge innovation will appear when network density is moderate. Originality/value Although previous research has identified the importance of knowledge increase in promoting sustainable development of supply chain, far less attention was given to the study of the effect of network structure on the knowledge increase in supply chain. This study thus fulfills the research gap by providing a description of the process of knowledge increase with the consideration of network density. The conclusion is of great significance for the choice of network density for sustainable development of supply chain.

[1]  Cinzia Battistella,et al.  Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review , 2015, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[2]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Chih-Hsing Liu,et al.  The effects of innovation alliance on network structure and density of cluster , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Qingqi Long.  A multi-methodological collaborative simulation for inter-organizational supply chain networks , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Liang Jua.  A study on multiple network embeddedness and knowledge creation performance of cluster firms , 2015 .

[6]  Peter Naudé,et al.  Developing Effective Alliance Partnerships: Lessons from a Case Study , 2006 .

[7]  M. Cao,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance , 2011 .

[8]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[9]  Chen Xiao-rong.  A Brief Review of Complex Networks and Its Application , 2005 .

[10]  Shen Rui-fan.  Evolution model of knowledge network in agile supply chain and simulation of the knowledge diffusion , 2014 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[12]  Jie Lin,et al.  Modeling and distributed simulation of supply chain with a multi-agent platform , 2011 .

[13]  Matthew S. Kraatz.  Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[14]  LI Jie-yi.  Relationships Among Network Structure,Knowledge Integration and Knowledge-intensive Team Performance , 2011 .

[15]  R. Weaver,et al.  The influence of relationship quality on the innovation capacity in traditional food chains , 2013 .

[16]  C. Phelps.  A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[17]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[18]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Rupak Rauniar,et al.  Unravelling the link between knowledge management and supply chain integration: an empirical study , 2013 .

[21]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[22]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks , 2003 .

[23]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[24]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[25]  Mohamed Moalla,et al.  Multi-agent modelling for replenishment policies simulation in supply chains , 2010 .

[26]  Yong Geng,et al.  Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty , 2013 .

[27]  K. Rost.  The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation , 2011 .

[28]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Supply Chain Knowledge and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Min Lin,et al.  Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer , 2010 .

[30]  Murali Sambasivan,et al.  Impact of knowledge management in supply chain management: A study in Malaysian manufacturing companies , 2009 .

[31]  Mark Rogers,et al.  Network density and R&D spillovers , 2004 .

[32]  Pervaiz Akhtar,et al.  Embracing supply chain agility: an investigation in the electronics industry , 2016 .

[33]  José Arnaldo Barra Montevechi,et al.  Perspectives and relationships in Supply Chain Simulation: A systematic literature review , 2016, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[34]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[35]  Rosanna Garcia.  Uses of Agent-Based Modeling in Innovation/New Product Development Research , 2005 .

[36]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[37]  Jing Li,et al.  Multi-agent simulation for the dominant players' behavior in supply chains , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[38]  R. Gulati,et al.  Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust , 2008 .

[39]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[40]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[41]  Sophie D'Amours,et al.  Agent-based simulations for advanced supply chain planning and scheduling: The FAMASS methodological framework for requirements analysis , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[42]  S. Koh,et al.  NATURAL RESOURCE BASED GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2012 .

[43]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams , 2009 .

[44]  Benoît Montreuil,et al.  Toward a methodological framework for agent-based modelling and simulation of supply chains in a mass customization context , 2007, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[45]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[47]  Wu Hong-mei.  Multi-agent model of knowledge diffusion in network space , 2003 .

[48]  Linda Argote,et al.  Routines and transactive memory systems: Creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations , 2016 .

[49]  Hu Wan-li.  The Complex Network Model of Knowledge Diffusion , 2008 .

[50]  G. Padula.  Enhancing the Innovation Performance of Firms by Balancing Cohesiveness and Bridging Ties , 2008 .