The acquisition of past tense morphology in Icelandic and Norwegian children: an experimental study

Icelandic and Norwegian past tense morphology contain strong patterns of inflection and two weak patterns of inflection. We report the results of an elicitation task that tests Icelandic and Norwegian children's knowledge of the past tense forms of a representative sample of verbs. This cross-sectional study of four-, six- and eight-year-old Icelandic (n = 92) and Norwegian (n = 96) children systematically manipulates verb characteristics such as type frequency, token frequency and phonological coherence--factors that are generally considered to have an important impact on the acquisition of inflectional morphology in other languages. Our findings confirm that these factors play an important role in the acquisition of Icelandic and Norwegian. In addition, the results indicate that the predominant source of errors in children shifts during the later stages of development from one weak verb class to the other. We conclude that these findings are consistent with the view that exemplar-based learning, whereby patterns of categorization and generalization are driven by similarity to known forms, appropriately characterizes the acquisition of inflectional systems by Icelandic and Norwegian children.

[1]  S. Kuczaj The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms , 1977 .

[2]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .

[3]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[4]  H. G. Simonsen,et al.  Testing past tense inflection in Norwegian: a diagnostic tool for identifying SLI children? , 1998 .

[5]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  Where Defaults Don't Help: the Case of the German Plural System , 1996, ArXiv.

[7]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model , 1991, Cognition.

[8]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Default Generalisation in Connectionist Networks. , 1995 .

[9]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns , 1993 .

[10]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[11]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Consistency effects in the generation of past tense morphology , 1990 .

[13]  G. Marcus,et al.  Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals , 1992, Cognition.

[14]  M. Orsolini,et al.  Acquiring Regular and Irregular Inflection in a Language with Verb Classes , 1998 .

[15]  J. Berko The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[16]  Virginia A. Marchman,et al.  Children's Productivity in the English Past Tense: The Role of Frequency, Phonology, and Neighborhood Structure , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  A usage-based model , 1988 .

[18]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[19]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Rules and schemas in the development and use of English past tense , 1982 .

[20]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[21]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated , 1990 .

[22]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[23]  V. Marchman Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhoo , 1997 .

[24]  D. Ravid,et al.  Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic , 1999 .

[25]  S Pinker,et al.  Weird past tense forms , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  V. Marchman,et al.  Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense , 1996, Cognition.

[27]  G. Marcus,et al.  Children's overregularization of English plurals: a quantitative analysis , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  V. Marchman,et al.  From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.

[29]  S Pinker,et al.  Rules of language. , 1991, Science.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[31]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..