Review of Chosen Control Algorithms Used for Small UAV Control

In this article review of chosen control algorithms used for small UAV at Department of Control Systems of Rzeszów University of Technology and their properties is presented. At first, control laws based on modified PID algorithms are described. The example of modification is the use of double differentiation in the algorithm. Proposed modifications improve control quality. Next, model following LQR algorithms is introduced. Implementation of that algorithm improves control quality in the flight at trajectory. In the algorithm presented integration between desired trajectory and plant trajectory is introduced as an additional state.Another algorithm which is presented is sliding mode control algorithm as an example of robust control. It allows you to control plane in event of a fault. Appropriate selection of sliding surface ensures the stability of the system and good quality control under normal operating conditions and enables flight in the event of non-critical damage. To improve the quality control in emergency mode, the parameters of the sliding surface during flight can be modified. The last presented algorithm is model reference adaptive controller. The adaptation mechanism is derived from second Lyapunov method. It also enables control in the case of chosen faults. An example presented in the article is realized for roll angle control. In the case of control surface fault (e.g. aileron or rudder), the algorithm enables aircraft control. In that case control surface fault is treated as an uncertainty of model used.

[1]  Andrzej Tomczyk,et al.  Possibilities of using software redundancy in low cost aeronautical control systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace).

[2]  Tomasz Rogalski,et al.  The new conception of the laboratory testing of the FBW control system for small aircraft , 2004 .

[3]  Andrzej Tomczyk In‐flight tests of navigation and control system of unmanned aerial vehicle , 2003 .

[4]  Grzegorz Kopecki,et al.  Aircraft attitude calculation with the use of aerodynamic flight data as correction signals , 2014 .

[5]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[6]  Andrzej Tomczyk,et al.  Algorithms of Measurement System for a Micro UAV , 2013 .

[7]  Leszek Ambroziak,et al.  Vision-based obstacle avoidance for unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011, 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[8]  H. Kwakernaak,et al.  Feedback Systems , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[9]  Pawel Rzucidlo,et al.  The Selected Innovative Solutions in UAV Control Systems Technologies , 2014 .

[10]  Grzegorz Kopecki,et al.  The Integration of a Prototype Pitch Control Application with IMA2G Devices , 2013 .

[11]  Grzegorz Kopecki,et al.  Aircraft Trajectory Model Following Control With The Use of Linear Quadratic Regulator Control Laws , 2012 .

[12]  Pawel Rzucidlo,et al.  Unmanned Air Vehicle Research Simulator - Prototyping and Testing of Control and Navigation Systems , 2013 .

[13]  Andrzej Burghardt,et al.  Conventional and Fuzzy Force Control in Robotised Machining , 2013 .

[14]  Bartosz Brzozowski,et al.  UAV Avionics System Software Development Using Simulation Method , 2013 .

[15]  Grzegorz Kopecki Control computers diagnostics for UAV flight control system , 2016 .

[16]  Andrzej Tomczyk,et al.  Safety enhanced digital flight control system , 2009 .

[17]  Jinkun Liu,et al.  Advanced Sliding Mode Control for Mechanical Systems , 2011 .

[18]  Arkadiusz Mystkowski,et al.  Implementation and investigation of a robust control algorithm for an unmanned micro-aerial vehicle , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[19]  M. Hoagland,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION , 2015 .