Apparent Dielectric Constant and Effective Frequency of TDR Measurements: Influencing Factors and Comparison

When measuring soil water content by time domain reflectometry (TDR), several methods are available for determining the related apparent dielectric constant ( K a ) from the TDR waveform. Their influencing factors and effective frequencies have not been extensively investigated and results obtained from different methods have not been critically compared. The purpose of this study was to use numerical simulations to systematically investigate the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion on K a and the associated effective frequency. Not only does the dielectric dispersion significantly affect the measured K a , it also plays an important role in how K a is affected by the electrical conductivity and cable length. Three methods for determining K a were compared, including the dual tangent, single tangent, and derivative methods. Their effective frequencies were carefully examined with emphasis on whether the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion can be accounted for by the estimated effective frequency. The results show that there is no consistent trend between the change in K a and the change in effective frequency as the influencing factors vary. Compensating the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion by the effective frequency seems theoretically infeasible. To improve the accuracy of TDR soil water content measurements in the face of these influencing factors, future studies are recommended toward TDR dielectric spectroscopy or developing signal processing techniques for determining the dielectric permittivity near the optimal frequency range.

[1]  Dennis Timlin,et al.  Comparison of Three Methods to Obtain the Apparent Dielectric Constant from Time Domain Reflectometry Wave Traces , 1996 .

[2]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Clarification and Calibration of Reflection Coefficient for Electrical Conductivity Measurement by Time Domain Reflectometry , 2008 .

[3]  James A. Strickland.  Time-domain reflectometry measurements , 1970 .

[4]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  On the effective measurement frequency of time domain reflectometry in dispersive and nonconductive dielectric materials , 2005 .

[5]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Simultaneous Measurement of Soil Penetration Resistance and Water Content with a Combined Penetrometer-TDR Moisture Probe , 2001 .

[6]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Time Domain Reflectometry Laboratory Calibration in Travel Time, Bulk Electrical Conductivity, and Effective Frequency , 2005 .

[7]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Comprehensive wave propagation model to improve TDR interpretations for geotechnical applications , 2007 .

[8]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Frequency Domain Versus Travel Time Analyses of TDR Waveforms for Soil Moisture Measurements , 2003 .

[9]  S. Jones,et al.  A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[10]  Sally D. Logsdon,et al.  Effect of Cable Length on Time Domain Reflectometry Calibration for High Surface Area Soils , 2000 .

[11]  J. Starr,et al.  Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes : Laboratory calibration , 1997 .

[12]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[13]  A. Hippel,et al.  Dielectrics and Waves , 1966 .

[14]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Accurate time domain reflectometry measurement of electrical conductivity accounting for cable resistance and recording time , 2007 .

[15]  T. J. Dean,et al.  SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE, PART I. SENSOR DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[16]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  System for Automating and Multiplexing Soil Moisture Measurement by Time‐Domain Reflectometry , 1990 .

[17]  D. Or,et al.  Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: A physical model , 1999 .

[18]  Dani Or,et al.  Frequency analysis of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) with application to dielectric spectroscopy of soil constituents , 1999 .

[19]  Alberto De Santis,et al.  Role of dispersive effects in determining probe and electromagnetic parameters by time domain reflectometry , 2006 .

[20]  Aramis Lopez,et al.  Analysis of Methods Used in Time Domain Reflectometry Response , 1996 .

[21]  T. Heimovaara.  Design of Triple‐Wire Time Domain Reflectometry Probes in Practice and Theory , 1993 .

[22]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Development of TDR penetrometer through theoretical and laboratory investigations: 1. Measurement of soil dielectric permittivity , 2006 .

[23]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Considerations for Improving the Accuracy of Permittivity Measurement Using TDR: Air/Water Calibration, Effects of Cable Length , 2003 .