Geographic Scope, Product Diversification and the Corporate Performance of Japanese Firms

The study extends research on the geographic scope, product diversification and performance relationship by exploring both the antecedents and consequences of geographic scope (multinationality). In so doing, it addresses a fundamental criticism of the geographic scope-performance relationship; namely, that the observed positive relationship between geographic scope and performance is spurious because it is the possession of proprietary assets that are the foundation of superior performance, not expansion into international markets per se. We tested the research model with data on the corporate performance of 399 Japanese manufacturing firms. In the Partial Least Squares analyses used to examine the study's six main hypotheses, we demonstrate that geographic scope was positively associated with firm profitability, even when the competing effect of proprietary assets on firm performance was considered. Further, we find that performance was not related to the extent of product diversification; although investment levels in rent-generating, proprietary assets were related to the extent of product diversification.

[1]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[2]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Research on International Business: Problems and Prospects , 1998 .

[3]  J. Dunning.  Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? , 1998 .

[4]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[5]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries , 1997 .

[6]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  Seeing The Big Picture: The Influence Of Industry, Diversification, And Business Strategy On Performance , 1997 .

[7]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Japanese multinationals in the global economy , 1997 .

[8]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1996 .

[9]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Conducting and Integrating Strategy Research at the International, Corporate, and Business Levels: Issues and Directions , 1995 .

[10]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[11]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy , 1995 .

[12]  J. Hennart,et al.  Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States , 1993 .

[13]  Peter Hwang,et al.  MULTINATIONALS' DIVERSIFICATION AND THE RISK-RETURN TRADE-OFF , 1993 .

[14]  Sea Jin Chang.  A knowledge-based perspective on corporate growth : entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981-89 , 1992 .

[15]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  Why Investors Value Multinationality , 1993 .

[16]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  Diversification and Performance: Critical Review and Future Directions* , 1991 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States , 1991 .

[18]  J. Hennart,et al.  The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the united states , 1991 .

[19]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[21]  Keith Hayward,et al.  The internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises , 1990 .

[22]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: A Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives , 1990 .

[23]  H. Yamawaki.  Exports and Foreign Distributional Activities - Evidence On Japanese Firms in the United-states , 1990 .

[24]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research , 1990 .

[25]  Nagesh D Kumar,et al.  Multinational Enterprises in India: Industrial Distribution, Characteristics, and Performance , 1990 .

[26]  Robert Pearce,et al.  The Internationalization of Research and Development by Multinational Enterprises , 1990 .

[27]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis , 1989 .

[28]  Karel Cool,et al.  Business strategy, market structure and risk-return relationships: a structural approach , 1989 .

[29]  Peter Hwang,et al.  Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance , 1989 .

[30]  David Jones,et al.  Corporate strategy , 1989, Nature.

[31]  Howard Thomas,et al.  DIVERSITY, DIVERSIFICATION, AND PROFITABILITY AMONG BRITISH MANUFACTURING COMPANIES, 1972-84 , 1988 .

[32]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q , 1988 .

[33]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[34]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[35]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies , 1987 .

[36]  J. Barney.  Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1986 .

[37]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Product-Market Diversification and Market Power , 1985 .

[38]  K. Palepu.  Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[39]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Risk/Return Performance of Diversified Firms , 1985 .

[40]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Diversification Strategy and Choice of Country: Diversifying Acquisitions Abroad by U.S. Multinationals, 1978–1980 , 1985 .

[41]  R. Schmalensee.  Do Markets Differ Much , 1984 .

[42]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[43]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[44]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Diversification Strategy, Accounting Determined Risk, and Accounting Determined Return , 1982 .

[45]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy versus market structure , 1981 .

[46]  R. Bettis.  Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[47]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[48]  Guvenc G. Alpander,et al.  International Diversification and the Multinational Enterprise , 1980 .

[49]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  Monopolistic Advantages and Foreign Involvement by U.S. Manufacturing Industry , 1980 .

[50]  Industriens Utredningsinstitut,et al.  The multinational operations of Swedish firms: An analysis of determinants and effects , 1979 .

[51]  Thomas A. Pugel.  International market linkages and U.S. manufacturing: Prices, profits, and patterns , 1978 .

[52]  S. Hymer,et al.  The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , 1976 .

[53]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[54]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Causes of Direct Investment: Foreign Firms' Shares in Canadian and United Kingdom Manufacturing Industries , 1974 .

[55]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Managing the multinational enterprise : organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiaries , 1972 .

[56]  Thomas Horst.  Firm and Industry Determinants of the Decision to Invest Abroad: An Empirical Study , 1972 .

[57]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[58]  R. Caves.  International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment , 1971 .

[59]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[60]  J. M. Ferguson,et al.  Diversification and Integration in American Industry , 1963 .

[61]  W. Hogan,et al.  A THEORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE FIRM , 1961 .

[62]  E. Penrose,et al.  Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Firm , 1956 .