Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements.

Accurate clinical interpretation of the sound velocity derived from axial transmission devices requires a detailed understanding of the propagation phenomena involved and of the bone factors that have an impact on measurements. In the low megahertz range, ultrasonic propagation in cortical bone depends on anisotropic elastic tissue properties, porosity and the cortical geometry (e.g., thickness). We investigated 10 human radius samples from a previous biaxial transmission study using a 50-MHz scanning acoustic microscope (SAM) and synchrotron radiation microcomputed tomography. The relationships between low-frequency axial transmission sound speed at 1 and 2 MHz, structural properties (cortical width Ct.Wi, porosity, Haversian canal density and material properties (acoustic impedance, mineral density) on site-matched cross-sections were investigated. Significant linear multivariate regression models (1 MHz: R(2) = 0.84, p < 10(-4), root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 38 m/s, 2 MHz: R(2) = 0.65, p < 10(-4), RMSE = 48 m/s) were found for the combination of Ct.Wi with porosity and impedance. A new model was derived that accounts for the nonlinear dispersion relation with Ct.Wi and predicts axial transmission velocities measured at different ultrasonic frequencies (R(2) = 0.69, p < 10(-4), RMSE = 52 m/s).

[1]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  An In Vitro Study of the Ultrasonic Axial Transmission Technique at the Radius: 1‐MHz Velocity Measurements Are Sensitive to Both Mineralization and Intracortical Porosity , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  G. Pharr,et al.  Mechanical and morphological variation of the human lumbar vertebral cortical and trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  J. Middleton,et al.  Interfaces in medicine and mechanics--2 , 1991 .

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[6]  Tommi Kärkkäinen,et al.  Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[7]  W. Arnold,et al.  Measurement of elastic impedance with high spatial resolution using acoustic microscopy , 1995 .

[8]  P Zioupos,et al.  The anisotropic Young's modulus of equine secondary osteones and interstitial bone determined by nanoindentation. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  The acoustic properties of normal and imbedded bovine bone as measured by acoustic microscopy. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  P. Christel,et al.  A reflection scanning acoustic microscope for bone and bone‐biomaterials interface studies , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  E. Bossy,et al.  Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[13]  K. Raum Ultrasonic Characterization of Hard Tissues , 2003 .

[14]  C. M. Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Consensus Development Conference , 1984 .

[17]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of freezing and freeze‐drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  A. Meunier,et al.  The acoustic and structural properties of the human femur. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  W. Arnold,et al.  Erratum: ‘‘Measurement of elastic impedance with high spatial resolution using acoustic microscopy’’ [Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 745 (1995)] , 1996 .

[20]  N. Langrana,et al.  The application of scanning acoustic microscopy in a bone remodeling study. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  S. Cheng,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Cortical Bone Characteristics In Vivo , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  R. Recker,et al.  Elastic properties of osteoporotic bone measured by scanning acoustic microscopy. , 1995, Bone.

[23]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  Bone mineral lies mainly outside collagen fibrils: predictions of a composite model for osteonal bone. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P Zioupos,et al.  Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. , 1998, Bone.

[25]  K. Raum,et al.  Multilayer analysis: quantitative scanning acoustic microscopy for tissue characterization at a microscopic scale , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  A. Meunier,et al.  Scanning Acoustic Microscopy of human and canine cortical bone microstructure at high frequencies. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[27]  H K Genant,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. , 1998, Bone.

[28]  J. Timonen,et al.  Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  Kay Raum,et al.  Frequency and resolution dependence of the anisotropic impedance estimation in cortical bone using time-resolved scanning acoustic microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[30]  John H. Cantrell,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation , 2004 .

[31]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Timo Jämsä,et al.  Mechanical properties in long bones of rat osteopetrotic mutations. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  A. Meunier,et al.  Scanning acoustic microscope studies of the elastic properties of osteons and osteon lamellae. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  C M Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis. , 1994, Clinical rheumatology.

[35]  D B Burr,et al.  Elastic anisotropy and collagen orientation of osteonal bone are dependent on the mechanical strain distribution , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[36]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[37]  G. Pharr,et al.  Correlations between osteocalcin content, degree of mineralization, and mechanical properties of C. carpio rib bone. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. , 1997, Bone.

[39]  P Zioupos,et al.  Ageing Human Bone: Factors Affecting its Biomechanical Properties and the Role of Collagen , 2001, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[40]  M. Popovtzer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. , 1995, Bone.

[41]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[42]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  P Cloetens,et al.  A synchrotron radiation microtomography system for the analysis of trabecular bone samples. , 1999, Medical physics.

[44]  F Peyrin,et al.  Synchrotron Radiation Microtomography Allows the Analysis of Three‐Dimensional Microarchitecture and Degree of Mineralization of Human Iliac Crest Biopsy Specimens: Effects of Etidronate Treatment , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  D. Burr,et al.  Mineral anisotropy in mineralized tissues is similar among species and mineral growth occurs independently of collagen orientation in rats: Results from acoustic velocity measurements , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[46]  D. Burr,et al.  Contribution of collagen and mineral to the elastic anisotropy of bone , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[47]  G. M. Pharr,et al.  Relationship Between Ultrastructure and the Nanoindentation Properties of Intramuscular Herring Bones , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  F. Patat,et al.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[49]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation : Engineering and Biological Material Characterization , 2003 .

[50]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. , 2000, Bone.

[51]  J Y Rho,et al.  Anisotropic properties of human tibial cortical bone as measured by nanoindentation , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[52]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  The anisotropy of osteonal bone and its ultrastructural implications. , 1995, Bone.

[53]  Martin Heller,et al.  Assessing Bone Status Beyond BMD: Evaluation of Bone Geometry and Porosity by Quantitative Ultrasound of Human Finger Phalanges , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[54]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[55]  G. Pharr,et al.  Effects of anisotropy on elastic moduli measured by nanoindentation in human tibial cortical bone. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[56]  J. Katz,et al.  Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Study of Human Cortical and Trabecular Bone , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  P. Christel,et al.  Characterization of Local Anisotropic Elastic Properties of Femoral and Tibial Diaphysis Using Acoustic Transmission Measurements and Acoustic Microscopy , 1991 .

[58]  Reinhard Barkmann,et al.  Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population‐Based Sample: The OPUS Study , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[59]  G. Pharr,et al.  Variations in the individual thick lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation. , 1999, Bone.