Intelligent finite element mesh generation

A knowledge-based and automatic finite element mesh generator (INTELMESH) for two-dimensional linear elasticity problems is presented. Unlike other approaches, the proposed technique incorporates the information about the object geometry as well as the boundary and loading conditions to generate an a priori finite element mesh which is more refined around the critical regions of the problem domain. INTELMESH uses a blackboard architecture expert system and the new concept of substracting to locate the critical regions in the domain and to assign priority and mesh size to them. This involves the decomposition of the original structure into substructures (or primitives) for which an initial and approximate analysis can be performed by using analytical solutions and heuristics. It then uses the concept of wave propagation to generate graded nodes in the whole domain with proper density distribution. INTELMESH is fully automatic and allows the user to define the problem domain with minimum amount of input such as object geometry and boundary and loading conditions. Once nodes have been generated for the entire domain, they are automatically connected to form well-shaped triangular elements ensuring the Delaunay property. Several examples are presented and discussed. When incorporated into and compared with the traditional approach to the adaptive finite element analysis, it is expected that the proposed approach, which starts the process with near optimal initial meshes, will be more accurate and efficient.

[1]  Robin Sibson,et al.  Locally Equiangular Triangulations , 1978, Comput. J..

[2]  J. Giarratano The CLIPS User?s Guide , 1998 .

[3]  Olivier Corby Blackboard architectures in computer aided engineering , 1986, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[4]  R. Plunkett,et al.  Formulas for Stress and Strain , 1965 .

[5]  V. A. Vainshtok,et al.  Estimation of stress intensity factors and nominal stresses from discrete cod values , 1991 .

[6]  T. D. Blacker,et al.  Automated quadrilateral mesh generation: A knowledge system approach , 1988 .

[7]  S. Lo A NEW MESH GENERATION SCHEME FOR ARBITRARY PLANAR DOMAINS , 1985 .

[8]  Mark Yerry,et al.  A Modified Quadtree Approach To Finite Element Mesh Generation , 1983, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  K. Haghighi,et al.  A knowledge‐based A‐priori approach to mesh generation in thermal problems , 1992 .

[10]  M. Pourazady,et al.  Optimization of a triangular mesh , 1991 .

[11]  Kjell Orsborn,et al.  Expert systems for finite element analysis and design optimization—a review , 1988 .

[12]  H. Saunders,et al.  Formulas for Stress and Strain – 5th Edition , 1979 .

[13]  Kamyar Haghighi,et al.  A knowledge-based design model for mechanical components , 1991 .

[14]  E. D. Reedy,et al.  Intensity of the stress singularity at the interface corner of a bonded elastic layer subjected to shear , 1991 .

[15]  Ernst Rank,et al.  An expert system for the optimal mesh design in the hp‐version of the finite element method , 1987 .

[16]  K. R. Grice,et al.  Robust, geometrically based, automatic two‐dimensional mesh generation , 1987 .

[17]  S. H. Lo,et al.  Delaunay triangulation of non‐convex planar domains , 1989 .

[18]  Robin Sibson,et al.  Computing Dirichlet Tessellations in the Plane , 1978, Comput. J..

[19]  H. W. Liu,et al.  The characterization of a crack-tip field , 1991 .

[20]  D. F. Watson Computing the n-Dimensional Delaunay Tesselation with Application to Voronoi Polytopes , 1981, Comput. J..

[21]  J. Cavendish Automatic triangulation of arbitrary planar domains for the finite element method , 1974 .