A user interface for a seven degree of freedom surgical robot

Minimally invasive robotic surgery combines the advantageous non-invasiveness of minimally invasive surgery with the positive aspects of precision technology, which is why innovative and cost effective designs are constantly being developed in this field. This paper presents the design of a joystick-type user interface for the master-slave control of an existing seven degree of freedom surgical robot. The slave system (7 DOF) had to be controlled with one hand of the surgeon, since ultimately the system would have two slave arms, each controlled by its own joystick. This raised the issue of designing a joystick that allows unhindered intuitive movement of the slave system. Experimental results of the joystick show, through subject tests, that operating the system is quick to learn.

[1]  Adrian Lobontiu,et al.  ROBOTIC SURGERY AND TELE-SURGERY: BASIC PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTION OF A NOVEL CONCEPT , 2007 .

[2]  Peter-John Christiane,et al.  Development of a minimally invasive robotic surgical manipulator , 2009 .

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. , 2001, JAMA.

[4]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Design of a minimally invasive surgical teleoperated master-slave system with haptic feedback , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[5]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery? , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Kang Li,et al.  Development of finger-motion capturing device based on optical linear encoder. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  A force reflective master-slave system for minimally invasive surgery , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[8]  R. Muradore,et al.  Robotic Surgery , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Jian S. Dai Surgical robotics and its development and progress , 2010, Robotica.

[10]  S. J. Phee,et al.  Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  B. Davies,et al.  Robotic surgery , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  Siebert Christo Worst Development of a low cost secondary slave manipulator for a minimally invasive robotic surgical system , 2012 .

[13]  David B. Camarillo,et al.  Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Cristovao Sousa,et al.  Haptic tele-manipulation for robotic-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery with explicit posture control , 2010, 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED'10.

[15]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.