Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] V. Patel,et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. , 2020, European urology.
[2] Y. Kohjimoto,et al. The association of length of the resected membranous urethra with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. , 2020, Urology journal.
[3] A. Basiri,et al. Revisiting Vesico-urethral anastomosis during open radical retropubic prostatectomy, simple and reproducible technique, a single center experience with 200 cases. , 2019, Urology journal.
[4] H. Woo,et al. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? , 2018, World Journal of Urology.
[5] M. Baghdadi,et al. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, World Journal of Urology.
[6] V. Patel,et al. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy , 2016, Journal of Robotic Surgery.
[7] C. Fiori,et al. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence. , 2016, European urology.
[8] M. Wirth,et al. Perioperative Complications after Radical Prostatectomy: Open versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach , 2013, Urologia Internationalis.
[9] Abhishek Srivastava,et al. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing , 2013, World Journal of Urology.
[10] J. Lynch,et al. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of urinary function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.
[11] A. Tewari,et al. Improving time to continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: augmentation of the total anatomic reconstruction technique by adding dynamic detrusor cuff trigonoplasty and suprapubic tube placement. , 2012, Journal of endourology.
[12] H. G. van der Poel,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[13] Li-Ming Su,et al. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes , 2012, BJU international.
[14] U. Capitanio,et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. , 2012, European urology.
[15] K. Palmer,et al. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[16] A. Tewari,et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk‐stratified approach to neural‐hammock sparing during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) , 2011, BJU international.
[17] K. Palmer,et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2011, European urology.
[18] A. Tewari,et al. Optimizing vesicourethral anastomosis healing after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from three techniques in 1900 patients. , 2010, Journal of endourology.
[19] M. Menon,et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. , 2009, European urology.
[20] Anthony V D'Amico,et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. , 2007, The Journal of urology.
[21] A. Shalhav,et al. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. , 2005, Urology.
[22] P. Walsh,et al. Effect of methylprednisolone on return of sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2004, Urology.
[23] N. Demartines,et al. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.
[24] A. Moinzadeh,et al. Urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the outcome of a surgical technique , 2003, BJU international.
[25] J. Stanford,et al. General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[26] P. Walsh,et al. Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.
[27] E. Kursh,et al. Alternative method of nerve-sparing when performing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1988, Urology.
[28] T. Schlomm,et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. , 2007, European urology.
[29] P. J. Donker,et al. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. , 1982, The Journal of urology.