Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-, medium-, and low-achieving students.

Oral interaction within cooperative learning groups was observed for high-, medium-, and low-achieving students. Initially, cooperative and individualistic learning situations were compared on achievement and attitudes. Forty-eight 4th-grade American students were assigned to learning situations on a stratified random basis controlling for ability and sex. They participated in the study for 55 min a day for 15 instructional days. Two observation schemes were used. The results for the cooperative situation were factor analyzed to determine the basic dimensions of oral interaction within cooperative learning groups. Five orthogonal factors were identified: Exchanging Task-Related Information, Elaborating on the Information, Encouraging Each Other to Learn, Disagreeing With Each Other's Conclusions, and Making Nontask Comments and Sharing Personal Feelings. The oral participation of students from different achievement levels was differentially related to achievement. Vocalizing was found to be more strongly related to achievement than was listening to other group members vocalize. Medium and low achievers especially benefited from cooperative learning experiences.

[1]  Vocalization during discrimination: Effects of a mixture of two types of verbalization patterns , 1968 .

[2]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  Producing positive interaction among Down syndrome and nonhandicapped teenagers through cooperative goal structuring. , 1980, American journal of mental deficiency.

[3]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Levels of processing, encoding strategies, and memory development. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[5]  B. Lahey,et al.  A method for combining occurrence and nonoccurrence interobserver agreement scores. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  D. Dansereau Cooperative Learning: Impact on Acquisition of Knowledge and Skills , 1983 .

[7]  D. B. Tarr,et al.  Verbalization, experimenter presence, and problem solving. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  R. Gagne,et al.  A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material. , 1976 .

[10]  R. Bjork,et al.  The interaction of encoding and rehearsal processes in the recall of repeated and nonrepeated items , 1975 .

[11]  D. Dansereau,et al.  Cooperative Learning Strategies in Processing Descriptive Text: Effects of Role and Activity Level of the Learner , 1984 .

[12]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Children's Learning in Large-Group and Small-Group Approaches: Study II. Report from the Project on Studies of Instructional Programming for the Individual Student. , 1979 .

[13]  R. Bjork,et al.  Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Ability × Treatment Interaction Effects on Children's Learning in Large-group and Small-group Approaches , 1981 .

[15]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  A process‐outcome analysis of learning in group and individual settings , 1980 .

[16]  M. W. Weir,et al.  Effects of verbalizations on discrimination learning and retention , 1967 .

[17]  R. Klatzky Human Memory: Structures And Processes , 1975 .

[18]  V. Lyons A study of elaborative cognitive processing as a variable mediating achievement in cooperative learning groups , 1982 .

[19]  J. Rynders,et al.  Interaction Between Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Teenagers as a Function of Situational Goal Structuring: Implications for Mainstreaming , 1979 .

[20]  M. Harris,et al.  Self-directed weight control through eating and exercise. , 1973, Behaviour research and therapy.

[21]  John P. Rickards,et al.  Effects of labeling and articulation on the attainment of concrete, abstract, and number concepts , 1971 .

[22]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[23]  J. Evans On the Inconstant Effects of Study Instructions. , 1977 .