Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedural Justice

In this article, I discuss local planning decision making as a form of public policy making undertaken by the state and involving some degree of public participation. I am interested in communlcative action as a normative basis for participatory decision making of public policy matters. Empirically, however, differences of discourses have led to participants talking past each other rather than negotiating with each other. Using a case study from Perth, Western Australia, I demonstrate the idea of procedural justice and examine the reasons for participants' dissatisfaction with public participation processes. I then develop some tentative principles for a more procedurally just communicative planning practice.

[1]  I. Young Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1990, The New Social Theory Reader.

[2]  J. Innes Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice , 1995 .

[3]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. , 1987 .

[4]  Duke Benadom Forward , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[5]  G. Leventhal What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[6]  J. Forester Response: Toward a critical sociology of policy analysis , 1995 .

[7]  S. Chambers,et al.  Discourse and democratic practices , 1995 .

[8]  I. Young Social Groups in Associative Democracy , 1992 .

[9]  What's left of Marx? , 1995 .

[10]  A. Hull Critical theory, public policy and planning practice , 1996 .

[11]  Robert Lebow,et al.  Sour grapes? , 1998, The Lancet.

[12]  E. Sampson Identity politics: Challenges to psychology's understanding. , 1993 .

[13]  S. Benhabib In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel : Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy in Hermeneutics in Ethics and Social Theory. , 1989 .

[14]  P. Healey,et al.  Communicative micropolitics: A story of claims and discourses , 1996 .

[15]  W. V. D. Kloot,et al.  The effect of procedural and interactional criteria on procedural fairness judgments , 1993 .

[16]  Ronald J. Fisher,et al.  Generic Principles for Resolving Intergroup Conflict , 1994 .

[17]  P. Healey Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[18]  John Gyford Citizens, Consumers and Councils , 1991 .

[19]  C. Seligman,et al.  Factors Motivating Community Participation in Regional Water-Allocation Planning: A Test of an Expectancy-Value Model , 1991 .

[20]  O. O’neill Justice, Gender and International Boundaries , 1990, British Journal of Political Science.

[21]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. , 1994 .