Longitudinal fluctuation in mammographic percent density differentiates between interval and screen‐detected breast cancer

Interval breast cancer (IC) has a more aggressive phenotype and higher mortality than screen‐detected cancer (SDC). In this case‐case study, we investigated whether the size of longitudinal fluctuations in mammographic percent density (PD fluctuation) was associated with the ratio of IC versus SDC among screened women with breast cancer. The primary study population consisted of 1,414 postmenopausal breast cancer cases, and the validation population of 1,241 cases. We calculated PD fluctuation as the quadratic mean of deviations between actual PD and the long‐term trend estimated by a mixed effects model. In a logistic regression model we examined the association between PD fluctuation and IC versus SDC including adjustments for PD at last screening, age at diagnosis, BMI and hormone replacement therapy. All statistical tests were two‐sided. There were 385 IC and 1,029 SDC in the primary study population, with PD fluctuations of 0.44 and 0.41 respectively (p = 0.0309). After adjustments, PD fluctuation was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC, with an estimated per‐standard deviation odds ratio of 1.17 (95% CI = 1.03–1.33), compared to 1.19 (95% CI = 1.04–1.38) in the validation population. In screened women with breast cancer, high fluctuation in mammographic percent density was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC. Whether this is entirely related to a reduced mammographic detectability or to a biological phenotype promoting faster tumor growth remains to be elucidated.

[1]  A. Rademaker,et al.  A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Jingmei Li,et al.  High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Otten,et al.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality? , 1998, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[5]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  X. Castells,et al.  Aggressiveness features and outcomes of true interval cancers: comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cancers , 2013, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[7]  Maria Sala,et al.  Phenotypic characterization and risk factors for interval breast cancers in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona, Spain , 2010, Cancer Causes & Control.

[8]  Sarah A. Edwards,et al.  Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. Narula MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY AND THE RISK AND DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER , 2016 .

[10]  E. Lynge,et al.  A simple way to measure the burden of interval cancers in breast cancer screening , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[11]  L. Kolonel,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Mammographic Density: The Multiethnic Cohort , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  S. Feig,et al.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers , 2013, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Influence of Patterns of Hormone Replacement Therapy Use and Mammographic Density on Breast Cancer Detection , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  G. Svane,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening Program in Stockholm County, Sweden – Aspects of Organization and Quality Assurance , 2010, Breast Care.

[17]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  C R Key,et al.  Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Abbas Cheddad,et al.  Enhancement of Mammographic Density Measures in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.