Quantification of PM 2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks

Abstract. Field blanks (bQF) and backup filters (quartz-fiber behind quartz-fiber filter; QBQ) have been adopted by US long-term air quality monitoring networks to estimate PM2.5 organic carbon (OC) sampling artifacts. This study documents bQF and QBQ carbon levels for the: 1) Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE); 2) Speciation Trends Network (STN; part of the Chemical Speciation Network [CSN]); and 3) Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) networks and examines the similarities/differences associated with network-specific sampling protocols. A higher IMPROVE sample volume and smaller filter deposit area results in PM2.5 areal density (μg/cm2 on filter) 3–11 times those of STN/CSN and SEARCH samples for the same ambient PM2.5 concentrations, thus reducing the relative contribution of sampling artifacts from passive OC adsorption. A relatively short (1–15 min) passive exposure period of STN/CSN and SEARCH bQF OC (0.8–1 μg/cm2) underestimates positive and negative OC artifacts resulting from passive adsorption or evaporation of semi-volatile organic compounds on quartz-fiber filters. This is supported by low STN/CSN and SEARCH bQF levels and lack of temporal or spatial variability among the sites within the networks. With a much longer period, ~7 days of ambient passive exposure, average IMPROVE bQF and QBQ OC are comparable (2.4±0.5 and 3.1±0.8 μg/cm2, respectively) and more than twice levels found in the STN/CSN and SEARCH networks. Sampling artifacts in STN/CSN were estimated from collocated IMPROVE samples based on linear regression. At six of the eight collocated sites in this study, STN/CSN bQFs underestimated OC artifacts by 11–34%. Using a preceding organic denuder in the SEARCH network minimized passive adsorption on QBQ, but OC on QBQ may not be attributed entirely to the negative sampling artifact (e.g., evaporated or volatilized OC from the front filter deposits after sample collection).

[1]  J. Chow,et al.  Ambient Aerosol Sampling , 2011 .

[2]  L. Chen,et al.  Methods to Assess Carbonaceous Aerosol Sampling Artifacts for IMPROVE and Other Long-Term Networks , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Paola Fermo,et al.  Organic and inorganic sampling artefacts assessment , 2009 .

[4]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Prospects for Future Climate Change and the Reasons for Early Action , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Spyros N. Pandis,et al.  Simulating secondary organic aerosol formation using the volatility basis-set approach in a chemical transport model , 2008 .

[6]  M. Birch,et al.  Effects of sampling artifacts on occupational samples of diesel particulate matter. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. Maccracken.  Prospects for Future Climate Change and the Reasons for Early Action , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  Prakash Doraiswamy,et al.  Advances in Integrated and Continuous Measurements for Particle Mass and Chemical Composition , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  Steven D. Kohl,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF CARBON SAMPLING ARTIFACTS IN THE IMPROVE, STN/CSN, AND SEARCH NETWORKS , 2008 .

[10]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  Equilibrium sorption of gaseous organic chemicals to fiber filters used for aerosol studies , 2007 .

[11]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The IMPROVE_A Temperature Protocol for Thermal/Optical Carbon Analysis: Maintaining Consistency with a Long-Term Database , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  W. Maenhaut,et al.  Sampling artefacts, concentration and chemical composition of fine water-soluble organic carbon and humic-like substances in a continental urban atmospheric environment , 2007 .

[13]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging , 2007, Science.

[14]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Modeling retained water content in measured aerosol mass , 2006 .

[15]  N. Frank,et al.  Retained Nitrate, Hydrated Sulfates, and Carbonaceous Mass in Federal Reference Method Fine Particulate Matter for Six Eastern U.S. Cities , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  R.K.M. Jayanty,et al.  PM2.5 Speciation Trends Network: Evaluation of Whole-System Uncertainties Using Data from Sites with Collocated Samplers , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Mar Viana,et al.  Influence of Sampling Artefacts on Measured PM, OC, and EC Levels in Carbonaceous Aerosols in an Urban Area , 2006 .

[18]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Effects of sampling artifacts and operating parameters on the performance of a semicontinuous particulate elemental carbon/organic carbon monitor. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  L. Chen,et al.  Particulate carbon measurements in California's San Joaquin Valley. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[20]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Sampling artifacts in measurement of elemental and organic carbon: Low-volume sampling in indoor and outdoor environments , 2005 .

[22]  P. Hopke,et al.  Estimation of Organic Carbon Blank Values and Error Structures of the Speciation Trends Network Data for Source Apportionment , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[23]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE samples. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[24]  G. Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part II. Filter-based measurements of fine and coarse particulate matter mass and composition. , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[25]  J. Putaud,et al.  INTERCOMP2000: the comparability of methods in use in Europe for measuring the carbon content of aerosol , 2004 .

[26]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[27]  S. Chu.  PM2.5 episodes as observed in the speciation trends network , 2004 .

[28]  P. Bhave,et al.  Primary and secondary organic aerosols over the United States: estimates on the basis of observed organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and air quality modeled primary OC/EC ratios , 2004 .

[29]  Hans Moosmüller,et al.  Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  PM data analysis: a comparison of two urban areas: Fresno and Atlanta , 2004 .

[31]  L. Chen,et al.  Modeling reflectance and transmittance of quartz-fiber filter samples containing elemental carbon particles: Implications for thermal/optical analysis , 2004 .

[32]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Positive and negative artifacts in particulate organic carbon measurements with denuded and undenuded sampler configurations , 2004 .

[33]  J. Brook,et al.  Improved Measurement of Seasonal and Diurnal Differences in the Carbonaceous Components of Urban Particulate Matter Using a Denuder-Based Air Sampler , 2004 .

[34]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[35]  G. Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part 1—Overview , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[36]  M. Uematsu,et al.  Positive artifact in the measurement of particulate carbonaceous substances using an ambient carbon particulate monitor , 2003 .

[37]  Delbert J. Eatough,et al.  Semi-volatile secondary organic aerosol in urban atmospheres: meeting a measurement challenge , 2003 .

[38]  Tan Zhu,et al.  Designing monitoring networks to represent outdoor human exposure. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[39]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of in situ and filter carbon measurements at the Fresno Supersite , 2002 .

[40]  Judith C Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City during winter 1997. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  B. Mader,et al.  Gas/solid partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) to air filters. 3. An analysis of gas adsorption artifacts in measurements of atmospheric SOCs and organic carbon (OC). WHen using teflon membrane filters and quartz fiber filters. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Laboratory and field investigation of the adsorption of gaseous organic compounds onto quartz filters , 2001 .

[43]  Bong Mann Kim,et al.  Positive Organic Carbon Artifacts on Filter Medium During PM2.5 Sampling in the South Coast Air Basin , 2001 .

[44]  J. Lewtas,et al.  Comparison of Sampling Methods for Semi-Volatile Organic Carbon Associated with PM2.5 , 2001 .

[45]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[46]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements , 2001 .

[47]  J. Chow,et al.  Air Quality Measurements from the Fresno Supersite , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[48]  B. Mader,et al.  Gas/solid partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) to air filters. 1. Partitioning of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to teflon membrane filters , 2000 .

[49]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Descriptive analysis of PM2.5 and PM10 at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX , 1996 .

[50]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the los angeles basin , 1994 .

[51]  K. M. Hart,et al.  High-volume air sampler for particle and gas sampling.2.use of backup filters to correct for the adsorption of gas-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the front filter. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  J. Chow,et al.  Evaluation of filter-based aerosol measurements during the 1987 Southern California Air Quality Study , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[53]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[54]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[55]  D. Fitz.  Reduction of the Positive Organic Artifact on Quartz Filters , 1990 .

[56]  W. White,et al.  Carbonaceous Particles and Regional Haze in the Western United States , 1989 .

[57]  L. Hansen,et al.  Determination of Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Particles in the Grand Canyon Area , 1989 .

[58]  J. Huntzicker,et al.  Vapor adsorption artifact in the sampling of organic aerosol: Face velocity effects , 1986 .

[59]  P. Groblicki,et al.  Problems in the sampling and analysis of carbon particulate , 1983 .

[60]  P. J. Huber,et al.  Numerical methods for the nonlinear robust regression problem , 1981 .

[61]  P. T. Roberts,et al.  On the nature and origins of visibility-reducing aerosols in the los angeles air basin , 1977 .

[62]  G. Tierney,et al.  Hygroscopic effects on weight determinations of particulates collected on glass-fiber filters. , 1967, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.