Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field

Background and aimsThere is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity.MethodsWe grew 23 lines of wheat in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In each year we estimated soil water profiles with electrical resistance tomography (ERT), electromagnetic inductance (EMI), penetrometer measurements and measurements of soil water content. We determined the relationships between the measured variable and soil water content and matric potential.ResultsWe found that ERT and penetrometer measurements were closely related to soil matric potential and produced the best discrimination between wheat lines. We found genotypic differences in depth of water uptake in soil water profiles and in the extent of surface drying.ConclusionsPenetrometer measurements can provide a reliable approach to comparing soil drying profiles by different wheat lines, and genotypic rankings are repeatable across years. EMI, which is more sensitive to soil water content than matric potential, and is less effective in drier soils than the penetrometer or ERT, nevertheless can be used to rapidly screen large populations for differences in root activity.

[1]  R. Richards,et al.  Soil coring at multiple field environments can directly quantify variation in deep root traits to select wheat genotypes for breeding , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  E. Greacen,et al.  Resistance to penetration of fine probes in compressible soil , 1966 .

[3]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  In‐field calibration of a dielectric soil moisture meter designed for use in an access tube , 2004 .

[4]  G. Slafer,et al.  Rooting patterns in near-isogenic lines of spring wheat for dwarfism , 1997, Plant and Soil.

[5]  L. J. Clark,et al.  The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[6]  P. Werner,et al.  Genotypic differences in deep water extraction associated with drought tolerance in wheat. , 2014, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[7]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large‐scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data , 2014 .

[8]  D. Schachtman,et al.  Challenges of modifying root traits in crops for agriculture. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[9]  L. J. Clark,et al.  Use of effective stress to predict the penetrometer resistance of unsaturated agricultural soils , 2005 .

[10]  D. Parasnis,et al.  Reciprocity theorems in geoelectric and geoelectromagnetic work , 1988 .

[11]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales , 2015, Water resources research.

[12]  T. Close,et al.  Integrated genetic map and genetic analysis of a region associated with root traits on the short arm of rye chromosome 1 in bread wheat , 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  Deformation and shrinkage effects on the soil water release characteristic , 2010 .

[14]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Soil water content. , 1998 .

[15]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography , 2010 .

[16]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  The effects of compaction and soil drying on penetrometer resistance , 2012 .

[17]  B. Kay,et al.  Variation in penetrometer resistance with soil properties: the contribution of effective stress and implications for pedotransfer functions , 2005 .

[18]  Shmuel Assouline,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Tomography of the Root Zone , 2015 .

[19]  J. Lynch,et al.  Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[20]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat , 2010 .

[21]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  Deep roots and soil structure , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[22]  B. Nicoullaud,et al.  Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography , 2003 .

[23]  R. Sylvester-Bradley,et al.  Root length densities of UK wheat and oilseed rape crops with implications for water capture and yield. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[24]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[25]  L. J. Clark,et al.  Does Soil Strength Play a Role in Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Soil Drying? , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[26]  A. G. Bengough,et al.  Penetrometer resistance, root penetration resistance and root elongation rate in two sandy loam soils , 1991, Plant and Soil.

[27]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Quantitative Two‐Layer Conductivity Inversion of Multi‐Configuration Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2011 .

[28]  Alec Westley Skempton,et al.  Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation , 1986 .

[29]  Peter Shanahan,et al.  The Use of Electromagnetic Induction to Monitor Changes in Soil Moisture Profiles beneath Different Wheat Genotypes , 2015 .

[30]  N. Jarvis,et al.  Some problems associated with the use of the neutron probe in swelling/shrinkling clay soils , 1987 .

[31]  R. W. Groom,et al.  Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low‐Induction‐Number Electromagnetic‐Induction Instruments , 2007 .

[32]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale , 2014 .

[33]  Problems arising from fixed-depth assessment of deeply weathered sandy soils , 2005 .

[34]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  The effects of dwarfing genes on seedling root growth of wheat , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[35]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  A simple model to predict soil penetrometer resistance as a function of density, drying and depth in the field , 2016 .

[36]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield , 2007 .

[37]  J. D. Mcneill.  Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[38]  C. Doussan,et al.  Estimation of the spatial variability of root water uptake of maize and sorghum at the field scale by electrical resistivity tomography , 2009, Plant and Soil.

[39]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Tools and Techniques: Electrical Methods , 2015 .

[40]  Z. Ni,et al.  Heterosis in root development and differential gene expression between hybrids and their parental inbreds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2006, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[41]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere , 2000 .

[42]  David Cooper,et al.  Soil Water Content , 2003 .