Modeling the Interpretation of Discourse Connectives

We propose a framework to model human comprehension of discourse connectives. Following the Bayesian pragmatic paradigm, we advocate that discourse connectives are interpreted based on a simulation of the production process by the speaker, who, in turn, considers the ease of interpretation for the listener when choosing connectives. Evaluation against the sense annotation of the Penn Discourse Treebank confirms the superiority of the model over literal comprehension. A further experiment demonstrates that the proposed model also improves automatic discourse parsing.

[1]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Context, scale structure, and statistics in the interpretation of positive-form adjectives , 2013 .

[2]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Nonliteral understanding of number words , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition , 2012, CogSci.

[4]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. , 2008, LREC.

[5]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[7]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Adjectival vagueness in a Bayesian model of interpretation , 2015, Synthese.

[9]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Perspectives on Bayesian Natural Language Semantics and Pragmatics , 2015 .

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Game theory in semantics and pragmatics , 2012 .

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian brain : probabilistic approaches to neural coding , 2006 .

[14]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[16]  Naomi Feldman,et al.  Why discourse affects speakers’ choice of referring expressions , 2015, ACL.

[17]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Game Theory and Pragmatics , 2005 .

[18]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  The CoNLL-2015 Shared Task on Shallow Discourse Parsing , 2015, CoNLL.

[19]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Embedded Implicatures as Pragmatic Inferences under Compositional Lexical Uncertainty , 2015, J. Semant..

[20]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Learning in the Rational Speech Acts Model , 2015, ArXiv.

[21]  Roger Levy,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning through semantic inference , 2016, Semantics and Pragmatics.