Purpose. to measure the contrast sensitivity function of varying degrees of myopia with two types of optical correction (spectacle lens and contact lens). Methods. One hundred and five myopic eyes and twenty-eight emmetropic eyes were collected. The myopic group included 105 eyes corrected with spectacle lenses and 71 eyes of them corrected with contact lenses, too; all had corrected vision acuity of 20/20 or better. The myopic eyes were divided into four groups: group 1 (-1D to -3D), low myopia; group 2 (-3.25D to -6D), medium myopia; group 3 (-6.25D to -12D), high myopia; and group 4 (> -12D), severe myopia. Spatial contrast sensitivity was measured using the OPTEC 2000 Contrast Sensitivity System. Results. In groups 1 and 2, no statistically significant difference was found between myopes and emmetropes. In group 3, statistically significant loss of contrast sensitivity at higher spatial frequencies was found for myopic subjects corrected with spectacle lens, but not for myopes corrected with contact lens. In group 4, myopic subjects corrected with spectacle lenses showed significantly reduced contrast sensitivity function at all spatial frequencies; subjects corrected with contact lenses showed statistical sensitivity losses at 6, 12, 18 cycle/degree spatial frequencies. Conclusions. 1. We may suppose that low and medium myopes (groups 1 and 2), who showed normal contrast sensitivity functions, had no retinal dysfunction. 2. For high myopes, contact lens correction could reduce optical defocus and improve contrast sensitivity function in high spatial frequencies. 3. As retinal function disturbances occurred in severe myopes, the diminished contrast sensitivity was not fully compensated by contact lens correction. 4. Loss of contrast sensitivity might be interpreted as evidence for early retinal function disruption before retinal pathological events occur in severe myopes.
[1]
F W Campbell,et al.
Subtle disturbances of vision after optic neuritis elicited by studying contrast sensitivity.
,
1979,
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[2]
R. Freeman,et al.
Nonoptical determinants of aniseikonia.
,
1983,
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[3]
Adriana Fiorentini,et al.
Spatial contrast sensitivity of myopic subjects
,
1976,
Vision Research.
[4]
R. Klein,et al.
Lacquer crack lesions in pathologic myopia.
,
1975,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[5]
I. Perlman,et al.
Retinal function in high refractive error assessed electroretinographically.
,
1984,
The British journal of ophthalmology.
[6]
A. E. Sloane,et al.
The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management
,
1986
.
[7]
G E Legge,et al.
Tolerance to visual defocus.
,
1987,
Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[8]
A J Bron,et al.
Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma.
,
1984,
The British journal of ophthalmology.
[9]
D Regan,et al.
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis--hidden visual loss: an auxiliary diagnostic test.
,
1977,
Brain : a journal of neurology.
[10]
T R Corwin,et al.
High myopia does not affect contrast sensitivity.
,
1986,
Current eye research.
[11]
J Rovamo,et al.
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN EVALUATION OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT DUE TO DIABETES
,
1983,
Acta ophthalmologica.
[12]
D. G. Green,et al.
Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.
,
1965,
The Journal of physiology.