The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997)

[1]  R. Solow.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[2]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[4]  F. Scherer,et al.  Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  J. Tilton.  International diffusion of technology : the case of semiconductors , 1971 .

[6]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[7]  John W. Kendrick,et al.  New developments in productivity measurement and analysis , 1981 .

[8]  R. Wilson,et al.  Innovation, competition, and government policy in the semiconductor industry , 1980 .

[9]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[10]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[11]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output , 1981 .

[12]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Technological change in the Norwegian whaling industry: A case-study in the use of patent-statistics as a technology indicator☆ , 1982 .

[13]  Michael E. D. Koenig,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of pharmaceutical research , 1983 .

[14]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope , 1983 .

[15]  B. Curry,et al.  Industrial Concentration: A Survey , 1983 .

[16]  B. Martin,et al.  Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy , 1983 .

[17]  D. Mowery.  Innovation, market structure, and government policy in the American semiconductor electronics industry: A survey , 1983 .

[18]  Field Research on the Link between Technological Innovation and Growth: Evidence from the International Semiconductor Industry , 1984 .

[19]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[20]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[21]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[22]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s , 1985 .

[23]  B. Bernanke,et al.  Employment, Hours, and Earnings in the Depression: an Analysis of Eightmanufacturing Industries , 1985 .

[24]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[25]  Leonard Solomon Silk,et al.  Communicating Economic Ideas and Controversies , 1986 .

[26]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[27]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[28]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[29]  Richard C. Levin,et al.  Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers , 1988 .

[30]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[32]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[35]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[36]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms , 1990 .

[37]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[38]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and theGrowth of Inputs , 1990 .

[40]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[41]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[42]  A. Gambardella.  Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[43]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[44]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[45]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[46]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[47]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[48]  Dennis J. Cahill.  The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms by Mariann Jelinek and Claudia Bird Schoonhoven. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993. 469 pages , 1994 .

[49]  Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function: Fiscal Years 1993-95. , 1994 .

[50]  P. Mohnen.  The Econometric Approach to R&D Externalities , 1994 .

[51]  L. Zucker,et al.  Virtuous Circles of Productivity: Star Bioscientists and the Institutional Transformation of Industry , 1995 .

[52]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[53]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Private and Social Returns to Research and Development , 1996 .

[54]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[55]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[56]  B. Smith,et al.  Technology, R&D, and the economy , 1996 .

[57]  Diana Hicks,et al.  A Morphology of Japanese and European Corporate Research Networks , 1996 .

[58]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[59]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[60]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Industrial research as a source of important patents , 1998 .

[61]  Michael Riordan,et al.  Crystal Fire: The Birth of the Information Age , 1998 .

[62]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Empirical Implications of Physician Authority in Pharmaceutical Decisionmaking , 1998 .

[63]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector , 1998 .

[64]  John E. Brandl,et al.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation , 1998 .

[65]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  Knowledge diffusion in the semiconductor industry , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  P. Kidwell,et al.  Crystal fire: the birth of the information age , 1999, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[67]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[68]  David F. Channell.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[69]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .

[70]  Kène Henkens,et al.  What Makes a Scientific article Influential , 2000 .

[71]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[72]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[73]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[74]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[75]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[76]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[77]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[78]  Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al.  What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers , 2001, Scientometrics.

[79]  Bradford’s Law and Related Statistical Patterns k,-..-L. <()-----,. _’l~urnr.wr IY , 2022 .