Should coronary arteries with less than fifty percent stenosis be bypassed?

The unpredictability of progressive coronary atherosclerosis has caused a trend toward grafting arteries with less than 50% stenosis. To evaluate the patency of these grafts and the effect on the native circulation, we reviewed 92 patients (80 men and 12 women) with 302 potentially graftable coronary arteries. Of 226 bypassed arteries, 100 had less than 50% stenosis. The mean interval between operation and catheterization was 16 months. Forty-five patients underwent routine postoperative studies; 47 had symptoms or had had a cardiac event. Patency rates were similar for grafts placed to arteries with less than 50% stenosis (79%) and to arteries with greater than 50% stenosis (81%). Forty internal mammary artery grafts had a 95% patency rate, 96.3% for those grafted to vessels with greater than 50% stenosis and 92.3% for those grafted to vessels with less than 50% stenosis. One hundred eighty-six vein grafts had a 77.4% patency rate, 76.8% for those grafted to arteries with less than 50% stenosis and 78.2% for those grafted to arteries with greater than 50% stenosis. No difference in patency rates occurred for vein grafts to the right, circumflex, or anterior descending coronary arteries. Progressive atherosclerosis in coronary arteries was defined as an increase of at least 20% in estimated stenosis or progression to total occlusion. Progressive atherosclerosis was demonstrated in 20% of 40 nongrafted arteries with less than 50% stenosis, 63% of 100 grafted vessels with less than 50% stenosis, and 51.6% of 93 vessels with greater than 50% stenosis. Thirty-nine percent of arteries grafted with the internal mammary artery had progressive atherosclerosis and 67% of those grafted with saphenous vein (p

[1]  S. Epstein,et al.  Saphenous vein bypass grafts: Long-term patency and effect on the native coronary circulation. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  F. Hildner,et al.  Progression of coronary artery disease. Cinearteriographic and clinical observations in medically and surgically treated patients. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  M. Frick,et al.  Changes in native coronary arteries after coronary bypass surgery. Role of graft patency, serum lipids and hypertension. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Rösch,et al.  Occlusion of Coronary Arteries after Vein Bypass , 1973, Circulation.

[5]  A. Bruschke,et al.  Natural history of obstructive coronary artery disease: ten-year study of 601 nonsurgical cases. , 1978, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[6]  D. Hackel,et al.  Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  F. Loop,et al.  Late clinical and arteriographic results in 500 coronary artery reoperations. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  R. Gorlin,et al.  Progression of Coronary Artery Disease: A Clinical Arteriographic Study , 1973, British heart journal.

[9]  P. Esente,et al.  Natural History of Coronary Disease in Patients with and Without Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery , 1974, Circulation.

[10]  H. Mcintosh,et al.  The First Decade of Aortocoronary Bypass Grafting, 1967-1977: A Review , 1978, Circulation.

[11]  S. Epstein,et al.  Long-term anatomic fate of coronary-artery bypass grafts and functional status of patients five years after operation. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Kramer,et al.  Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1981, Circulation.

[13]  R. Russell,et al.  Changes in Grafted and Nongrafted Coronary Arteries Following Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafting , 1974, Circulation.

[14]  R. Krone,et al.  Selection of coronary bypass. Anatomic, physiological, and angiographic considerations of vein and mammary artery grafts. , 1975, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  F. Loop,et al.  Isolated Left Anterior Descending Coronary Atherosclerosis: Long‐term Comparison of Internal Mammary Artery and Venous Autografts , 1980, Circulation.

[16]  Sheldon Wc Factors influencing patency of coronary bypass grafts. , 1978 .

[17]  S. Nitter‐Hauge,et al.  Does aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass surgery change the native coronary arteries? An angiographic follow-up of 60 patients. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[18]  V L Gott,et al.  Hemodynamics of aorta-to-coronary artery bypass. Experimental and analytical studies. , 1972, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  W. Roberts,et al.  Amount of narrowing by atherosclerotic plaque in 44 nonbypassed and 52 bypassed major epicardial coronary arteries in 32 necropsy patients who died within 1 month of aortocoronary bypass grafting. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  R. Russell,et al.  Long-Term Patency of Saphenous Veins For Coronary Bypass Grafting , 1978, Circulation.

[21]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Progression of Coronary Arterial Disease After Aortocoronary Bypass Grafts , 1973, Circulation.

[22]  L. Hughes,et al.  The internal mammary bypass graft: a superior second coronary artery. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  L. Wexler,et al.  Six-Year Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up of Patients with Previously Documented Complete Revascularization , 1978, Circulation.

[24]  G. E. Green,et al.  Internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery anastomosis. Three-year experience with 165 patients. , 1972, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Effect of Medical vs Surgical Treatment on Symptoms in Stable Angina Pectoris: The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Surgery for Coronary Arterial Occlusive Disease , 1979, Circulation.

[26]  J. W. Love,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial performance and graft patency following coronary bypass with the internal mammary artery. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  L. Cohn,et al.  Coronary artery anatomy before and after direct revascularization surgery: clinical and cinearteriographic studies in 67 selected patients. , 1975, American heart journal.

[28]  D. Tyras,et al.  Revascularization of the right coronary artery. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  A. Bruschke,et al.  The Anatomic Evolution of Coronary Artery Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Arteriography in 256 Nonoperated Patients , 1981, Circulation.

[30]  F. Loop,et al.  An 11 Year Evolution of Coronary Arterial Surgery (1967–1978) , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[31]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Internal mammary artery graft for ischemic heart disease. Effect of revascularization on clinical status and survival. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  P. Nixon Effect of medical vs surgical treatment on symptoms in stable angina pectoris. , 1980, Circulation.

[33]  G. Kakos,et al.  Coronary artery hemodynamics after aorto-coronary artery vein bypass. An experimental evaluation. , 1972, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Surgical treatment of coronary artery disease: pure graft operations, with a study of 741 patients followed 3--7 yr. , 1975, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[35]  V. Gott,et al.  Changes in intrinsic coronary circulation and segmental ventricular motion after saphenous-vein coronary bypass graft surgery. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  H. Aldridge,et al.  Progression of proximal coronary artery lesions to total occlusion after aorta-coronary saphenous vein bypass grafting. , 1971, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[37]  F. Spencer,et al.  Changes in the Underlying Coronary Circulation Secondary to Bypass Grafting , 1974, Circulation.

[38]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Loss of the improvement of angina between 1 and 7 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery: correlations with changes in vein grafts and in coronary arteries. , 1979, Circulation.

[39]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Progression of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease 5 to 7 Years After Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery , 1978, Circulation.