The Puzzle of Prosociality

How is cooperation among large numbers of unrelated individuals sustained? Cooperation generally requires altruism, where individuals take actions that are group-beneficial but personally costly. Why do selfish agents not drive out altruistic behavior? This is the puzzle of prosociality. Altruism is supported by culture. Sociology treats culture as a set of norms that are transmitted by socialization institutions and internalized by individuals. Altruism, in this approach, is thus sustained by the internalization of norms. Biology treats culture as knowledge that is passed to children from parents (vertical transmission), from other prominent adults (oblique transmission), and from peers (horizontal transmission), such that individuals with higher payoffs have a higher level of biological fitness, leading norms to follow a dynamic of Darwinian selection. Altruism, in this approach, can be sustained only if group selection is feasible, which it rarely is. Economics uses evolutionary game theory to model culture as strategies deployed in social interaction that evolve according to a replicator dynamic, in which individuals shift from lower to higher payoff norms. In this approach, altruism cannot be sustained, but cooperation is possible with repeated interactions and a sufficiently low discount rate. This paper integrates these approaches and shows that altruism, as well as norms that reduce both individual and group payoffs, can be supported in a stable equilibrium.

[1]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[2]  David M. Kreps Notes On The Theory Of Choice , 1988 .

[3]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The origin of altruism , 1998, Nature.

[4]  George Williams Group Selection , 1971 .

[5]  Dennis Chong Collective action and the civil rights movement , 1991 .

[6]  C. Geertz,et al.  Peddlers and Princes: Social Change and Economic Modernization in Two Indonesian Towns. , 1965 .

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Cooperation, Reciprocity and Punishment in Fifteen Small-scale Societies , 2001 .

[8]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[9]  J. Button Blacks and Social Change: Impact of the Civil Rights Movement in Southern Communities , 1989 .

[10]  W. Hamilton The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[11]  L. Cavalli-Sforza Cultural transmission and evolution , 1981 .

[12]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Seriousness of Social Dilemmas and the Provision of a Sanctioning System , 1988 .

[13]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Punishment in animal societies , 1995, Nature.

[14]  M. Feldman,et al.  Gene-culture coevolution: toward a general theory of vertical transmission. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Goodall,et al.  Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees , 1964, Nature.

[16]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[17]  R Boyd,et al.  Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  J. Alcock Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[19]  John D’Emilio The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Movement.Barry D. Adam , 1989 .

[20]  D. Wrong,et al.  The over-socialized conception of man in modern sociology. , 1961, Psychoanalysis and the psychoanalytic review.

[21]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[22]  D. Heckathorn The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action , 1996 .

[23]  H. Gintis Strong reciprocity and human sociality. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Individual Interactions, Group Conflicts, and the Evolution of Preferences , 2000 .

[25]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[26]  Joan E. Grusec,et al.  Parenting and children's internalization of values : a handbook of contemporary theory , 1997 .

[27]  G. Mackie Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account , 1996 .

[28]  D. Sperber,et al.  Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach , 1998 .

[29]  E. Durkheim Suicide: A Study in Sociology , 1897 .

[30]  M. Ghiselin,et al.  Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity , 1991, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[31]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups , 1995, Nature.

[32]  B. Skyrms Evolution of the social contract , 1996 .

[33]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[35]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device , 2001 .

[36]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Irrigation Institutions and the Games Irrigators Play: Rule Enforcement Without Guards , 1991 .

[37]  D. Colby Gays/Justice: A Study of Ethics, Society, and Law@@@The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Movement , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[38]  B. Charlesworth Levels of Selection in Evolution , 2000, Heredity.

[39]  R. Evans,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment , 2001 .

[40]  E. Wilson,et al.  Genes, mind, and culture : the coevolutionary process , 1982 .

[41]  James Andreoni,et al.  Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments , 1988 .

[42]  D. Wrong,et al.  The oversocialized conception of man , 1999 .

[43]  Robert M. May,et al.  Group selection , 1975, Nature.

[44]  Ruth Benedict,et al.  Patterns of Culture , 2019, Nature.

[45]  D. Hirshleifer,et al.  COOPERATION IN A REPEATED PRISONERS' DILEMMA WITH OSTRACISM , 1989 .

[46]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Genes, Mind and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. , 1982 .

[47]  P. Richerson,et al.  Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups , 1992 .

[48]  H. Gintis Welfare Economics and Individual Development: A Reply to Talcott Parsons , 1975 .

[49]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Sociological theory and modern society , 1968 .

[50]  D. Heckathorn COLLECTIVE ACTION, SOCIAL DILEMMAS AND IDEOLOGY , 1998 .

[51]  S. Bowles,et al.  The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[53]  M. Feldman,et al.  Gene-culture coevolution: models for the evolution of altruism with cultural transmission. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[55]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[56]  D. Barash The Biology of Moral Systems, Richard D. Alexander. Aldine, Hawthorne, New York (1987), xx, +301. Price $34.95 hardback, $16.95 paperback , 1987 .

[57]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[58]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[59]  A. Damasio,et al.  The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. , 1994, Science.

[60]  S. Zamir,et al.  Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study , 1991 .

[61]  Gary E. Belovsky,et al.  An optimal foraging-based model of hunter-gatherer population dynamics , 1988 .

[62]  Barrington Moore Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt , 1978 .