Activity reversal of Tet repressor caused by single amino acid exchanges

We explore by extensive mutagenesis regions in the sequence allowing reversal of the allosteric response of Tet repressor. The wild type requires anhydrotetracycline for induction. About 100 mutants are presented, which, in contrast, require the drug for repression. Their mutations are clustered at the interface of the DNA‐ and inducer‐binding domains. This interface consists of a central hydrophobic region surrounded by several hydrogen bonds. While most of the mutants described here contain two to five mutations, we found five positions in this region of TetR, at which single amino acid exchanges lead to activity reversal. They may disrupt the hydrogen‐bonding network bordering the domain interface. We assume that the mutations cause a repositioning of the DNA reading head with respect to the effector binding core so that the same conformational change can result in opposite activities.

[1]  F. Cordes,et al.  Conformational changes of the Tet repressor induced by tetracycline trapping. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Jeffrey H. Miller Experiments in molecular genetics , 1972 .

[3]  W. Stemmer Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling , 1994, Nature.

[4]  S. Balasubramanian,et al.  Protein alchemy: changing beta-sheet into alpha-helix. , 1997, Nature structural biology.

[5]  W. Hillen,et al.  Stepwise selection of TetR variants recognizing tet operator 6C with high affinity and specificity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  W. Hillen,et al.  Selection for Tn10 tet repressor binding to tet operator in Escherichia coli: isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants and combinatorial mutagenesis in the DNA binding motif. , 1991, Genetics.

[7]  W. Saenger,et al.  Characterization of non-inducible Tet repressor mutants suggests conformational changes necessary for induction , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  W. Hillen,et al.  Noninducible Tet repressor mutations map from the operator binding motif to the C terminus , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  W. Hillen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying expression of Tn10 encoded tetracycline resistance. , 1994, Annual review of microbiology.

[10]  U. Hahn,et al.  A general method for rapid site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1990, Gene.

[11]  M. T. Hasan,et al.  Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Gossen,et al.  Tetracyclines in the control of gene expression in eukaryotes , 2001 .

[13]  L. D. Smith,et al.  Mutations in the Tn10 tet repressor that interfere with induction. Location of the tetracycline-binding domain. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  W. Saenger,et al.  Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor–operator system , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  W. Hillen,et al.  Tet repressor induction without Mg2+. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[16]  W. Stemmer DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  W. Saenger,et al.  The complex formed between Tet repressor and tetracycline-Mg2+ reveals mechanism of antibiotic resistance. , 1995 .

[18]  G. Rose,et al.  Protein folding: Predicting predicting , 1994, Proteins.

[19]  W. Hillen,et al.  Two mutations in the tetracycline repressor change the inducer anhydrotetracycline to a corepressor. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  W. Hillen,et al.  Stepwise selection of TetR variants recognizing tet operator 4C with high affinity and specificity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  W. Saenger,et al.  Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance. , 1994, Science.

[22]  W. Hillen,et al.  Teaching TetR to recognize a new inducer. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[24]  D. T. Jones,et al.  Towards meeting the Paracelsus Challenge: The design, synthesis, and characterization of paracelsin-43, an alpha-helical protein with over 50% sequence identity to an all-beta protein. , 1996, Proteins.

[25]  Wolfgang Hillen,et al.  Gene regulation by tetracyclines. , 2004, Genetic engineering.

[26]  W. Saenger,et al.  Tetracycline-chelated Mg2+ ion initiates helix unwinding in Tet repressor induction. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[27]  W. Hillen,et al.  Gene regulation by tetracyclines. Constraints of resistance regulation in bacteria shape TetR for application in eukaryotes. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[28]  David T. Jones,et al.  Towards meeting the paracelsus challenge: The design, synthesis, and characterization of paracelsin‐43, an α‐helical protein with over 50% sequence identity to an all‐β protein , 1996 .

[29]  N. Clarke,et al.  A hybrid sequence approach to the paracelsus challenge , 1998, Proteins.

[30]  Suganthi Balasubramanian,et al.  Protein alchemy: Changing β-sheet into α-helix , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  W. Hillen,et al.  Tetracycline analogs affecting binding to Tn10-Encoded Tet repressor trigger the same mechanism of induction. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[32]  C. A. Thomas,et al.  Molecular cloning. , 1977, Advances in pathobiology.

[33]  M. Gossen,et al.  Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. , 1995, Science.

[34]  W. Hillen,et al.  Determinants of protein–protein recognition by four helix bundles: changing the dimerization specificity of Tet repressor , 1998, The EMBO journal.