The Economics of Climate Change: Summary of Conclusions

There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now . The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change is a serious global threat, and it demands an urgent global response. This Review has assessed a wide range of evidence on the impacts of climate change and on the economic costs, and has used a number of different techniques to assess costs and risks. From all of these perspectives, the evidence gathered by the Review leads to a simple conclusion: the benefits of strong and early action far outweigh the economic costs of not acting. Climate change will affect the basic elements of life for people around the world – access to water, food production, health, and the environment. Hundreds of millions of people could suffer hunger, water shortages and coastal flooding as the world warms. Using the results from formal economic models, the Review estimates that if we don't act, the overall costs and risks of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP each year, now and forever. If a wider range of risks and impacts is taken into account, the estimates of damage could rise to 20% of GDP or more. In contrast, the costs of action – reducing greenhouse gas emissions to avoid the worst impacts of climate change – can be limited to around 1% of global GDP each year.

[1]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  A framework for classifying denial of service attacks , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[2]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Modeling, simulation and measurements of queuing delay under long-tail internet traffic , 2003, SIGMETRICS '03.

[3]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Dynamics of TCP/RED and a scalable control , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[4]  Fouad A. Tobagi,et al.  Provisioning internet backbone networks to support latency sensitive applications , 2002 .

[5]  A. Proutière,et al.  Statistical bandwidth sharing: a study of congestion at flow level , 2001, SIGCOMM '01.

[6]  Ramana Rao Kompella,et al.  Analysis of a memory architecture for fast packet buffers , 2001, 2001 IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8552).

[7]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Scalable TCP congestion control , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[8]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Data networks as cascades: investigating the multifractal nature of Internet WAN traffic , 1998, SIGCOMM '98.

[9]  Cheng Song,et al.  High performance TCP in ANSNET , 1994, CCRV.

[10]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance , 1993, TNET.

[11]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Some observations on the dynamics of a congestion control algorithm , 1990, CCRV.

[12]  Marshall T. Rose,et al.  Management Information Base for network management of TCP/IP-based internets , 1990, RFC.