The role of p-type doping and the density of states on the modulation response of quantum dot lasers

The modulation response of quantum dot (QD) lasers is analyzed using a quasi-equilibrium approach. The model suggests that present QD lasers are limited due to hole levels that are closely spaced in energy, as well as inhomogeneous broadening. Significant improvements are predicted through p-type modulation doping. The results are consistent with present QD lasers being limited in their modulation response by their differential gain as opposed to carrier capture.

[1]  Jasprit Singh,et al.  Strain distribution and electronic spectra of InAs/GaAs self-assembled dots: An eight-band study , 1997 .

[2]  Self-assembled In/sub 0.5/Ga/sub 0.5/As quantum-dot lasers with doped active region , 2000 .

[3]  N. Ledentsov,et al.  Gain and differential gain of single layer InAs/GaAs quantum dot injection lasers , 1996 .

[4]  C. Caneau,et al.  Cavity length and doping dependence of 1.5- mu m GaInAs/GaInAsP multiple quantum well laser characteristics , 1990, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Quantum dimensionality, entropy, and the modulation response of quantum dot lasers , 2000 .

[6]  D. Bimberg,et al.  Spectral hole-burning and carrier-heating dynamics in InGaAs quantum-dot amplifiers , 2000, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[7]  M. Grundmann.  Feasibility of 5 Gbit/s wavelength division multiplexing using quantum dot lasers , 2000 .

[8]  Kerry J. Vahala,et al.  Effect of doping on the optical gain and the spontaneous noise enhancement factor in quantum well amplifiers and lasers studied by simple analytical expressions , 1988 .

[9]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Spectral engineering of carrier dynamics in In(Ga)As self-assembled quantum dots , 2001 .

[10]  D. Deppe,et al.  Temperature dependence of gain saturation in multilevel quantum dot lasers , 2000, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[11]  O. Shchekin,et al.  Discrete energy level separation and the threshold temperature dependence of quantum dot lasers , 2000 .

[12]  Jasprit Singh,et al.  SMALL-SIGNAL MODULATION AND DIFFERENTIAL GAIN OF SINGLE-MODE SELF-ORGANIZED IN0.4GA0.6AS/GAAS QUANTUM DOT LASERS , 1997 .

[13]  K. Nishi,et al.  Low chirp observed in directly modulated quantum dot lasers , 2000, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[14]  J. Laskar,et al.  Enhanced modulation bandwidth (20 GHz) of In/sub 0.4/Ga/sub 0.6/As-GaAs self-organized quantum-dot lasers at cryogenic temperatures: role of carrier relaxation and differential gain , 1998, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[15]  D. Bimberg,et al.  Study of high frequency response of self-organised stacked quantum dot lasers at room temperature , 1997 .

[16]  Johann Peter Reithmaier,et al.  High frequency characteristics of InAs/GaInAs quantum dot distributed feedback lasers emitting at 1.3 /spl mu/m , 2001 .

[17]  Excited-state dynamics and carrier capture in InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots , 2001 .

[18]  Jean-Pierre Leburton,et al.  Electron-hole alignment in InAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots: Effects of chemical composition and dot shape , 2001 .