Constrained electrical resistivity tomography Bayesian inversion using inverse Matérn covariance matrix

Bayesian inversion using maximum a posteriori estimator is a quantitative approach that has been successfully applied to the electrical resistivity tomography inverse problem. In most approaches, model covariance parameters are generally chosen as stationary and isotropic, which assumes a statistical homogeneity of the studied field. However, the statistical properties of resistivity within the earth are, in reality, location dependent due to spatially varying processes that control the bulk resistivity of rocks, such as water content, porosity, clay content, etc. Taking into account the spatial variability of the resistivity field, we use the nonstationary Matern covariance family, which is defined through linear stochastic partial differential equations. Two types of prior information are considered: structure orientation and spatially increasing the range with increasing depth. The latter is applied successfully on the first synthetic model, which aims at retrieving the depth of bedrock and the shape of the conductive lens. In the second synthetic example, a conductive dike model embedded into four layers is used to study the performance of structure orientation. Finally, the proposed approach is used to invert real data measured over an extensively characterized sandy-to-silty aquifer. First, the structure orientation of this aquifer was determined by applying a structure tensor calculated using gradients of the ground penetrating radar image. The introduction of this information gives a resistivity model that is more compatible with the aquifer structure.

[1]  P. Whittle ON STATIONARY PROCESSES IN THE PLANE , 1954 .

[2]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[3]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[4]  A. Dey,et al.  Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures , 1979 .

[5]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Inverse Problems Solved Using the Least Squares Criterion (Paper 1R1855) , 1982 .

[6]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Analyzing Oriented Patterns , 1985, IJCAI.

[7]  M. Stein,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of kriging , 1993 .

[8]  A. Binley,et al.  Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods. , 1996 .

[9]  W. Daily,et al.  The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data , 1996 .

[10]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion of geophysical data over a copper gold porphyry deposit; a case history for Mt. Milligan , 1997 .

[11]  D. LaBrecque,et al.  Stochastic Inversion Of 3D Ert Data , 1998 .

[12]  H. Maurer,et al.  Stochastic regularization: Smoothness or similarity? , 1998 .

[13]  Michael L. Stein,et al.  Interpolation of spatial data , 1999 .

[14]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Inverse problems with structural prior information , 1999 .

[15]  H. Kim,et al.  Inequality constraint in least-squares inversion of geophysical data , 1999 .

[16]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[17]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[18]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[19]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  A Bayes tour of inversion: A tutorial , 2001 .

[20]  S. Friedel,et al.  Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach , 2003 .

[21]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[22]  F. Day‐Lewis,et al.  Assessing the resolution‐dependent utility of tomograms for geostatistics , 2004 .

[23]  B. Minasny,et al.  The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms , 2005 .

[24]  C.R.E. de Oliveira,et al.  Constrained resistivity inversion using seismic data , 2005 .

[25]  T. Guenther,et al.  A General Approach for Introducing Information into Inversion and Examples from DC Resistivity Inversion , 2006 .

[26]  Christopher J Paciorek,et al.  Spatial modelling using a new class of nonstationary covariance functions , 2006, Environmetrics.

[27]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Linear inverse Gaussian theory and geostatistics , 2006 .

[28]  A. Binley,et al.  Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross‐hole electrical resistance and ground‐penetrating radar traveltime data , 2006 .

[29]  E. Haber,et al.  RESINVM3D: A 3D resistivity inversion package , 2007 .

[30]  Finn Lindgren,et al.  Explicit construction of GMRF approximations to generalised Matérn fields on irregular grids , 2007 .

[31]  P. Routh,et al.  Incorporating geostatistical constraints in nonlinear inversion problems , 2007 .

[32]  J. Idier Bayesian Approach to Inverse Problems: Idier/Bayesian , 2010 .

[33]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A comprehensive study of including structural orientation information in geophysical inversions , 2009 .

[34]  N. Cassidy Chapter 5 – Ground Penetrating Radar Data Processing, Modelling and Analysis , 2009 .

[35]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Handbook of spatial statistics , 2010 .

[36]  Paul D. Sampson,et al.  Constructions for Nonstationary Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[37]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .

[38]  T. Günther,et al.  Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization , 2012 .

[39]  R. Versteeg,et al.  Characterization of a contaminated wellfield using 3D electrical resistivity tomography implemented with geostatistical, discontinuous boundary, and known conductivity constraints , 2012 .

[40]  Roland Martin,et al.  Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data , 2012 .

[41]  Inference of the two dimensional GPR velocity field using collocated cokriging of Direct Push permittivity and conductivity logs and GPR profiles , 2012 .

[42]  Andrew Binley,et al.  2-D joint structural inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground penetrating radar data , 2012 .

[43]  F. Lindgren,et al.  Exploring a New Class of Non-stationary Spatial Gaussian Random Fields with Varying Local Anisotropy , 2013, 1304.6949.

[44]  R. Lefebvre,et al.  Conceptual model of leachate migration in a granular aquifer derived from the integration of multi-source characterization data (St-Lambert, Canada) , 2014, Hydrogeology Journal.

[45]  M. Chouteau,et al.  3D stochastic gravity inversion using nonstationary covariances , 2013 .

[46]  B. Ursin,et al.  Three-dimensional non-stationary and non-linear isotropic AVA inversion , 2013 .

[47]  Oliver Kuras,et al.  Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method , 2013 .

[48]  M. Karaoulis,et al.  Image-guided inversion of electrical resistivity data , 2014 .

[49]  D. Caterina,et al.  Case studies of incorporation of prior information in electrical resistivity tomography: comparison of different approaches , 2014 .

[50]  Haavard Rue,et al.  Does non-stationary spatial data always require non-stationary random fields? , 2014 .

[51]  A. Rivera,et al.  Field characterization and data integration to define the hydraulic heterogeneity of a shallow granular aquifer at a sub-watershed scale , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[52]  A. Kemna,et al.  Covariance-constrained difference inversion of time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography data , 2016 .