A Brief Review of Filtration Studies for Waste Treatment at the Hanford Site

This document completes the requirements of Milestone 1-2, PNNL Draft Literature Review, discussed in the scope of work outlined in the EM-31 Support Project task plan WP-2.3.6-2010-1. The focus of task WP 2.3.6 is to improve the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) understanding of filtration operations for high-level waste (HLW) to enhance filtration and cleaning efficiencies, thereby increasing process throughput and reducing the sodium demand (through acid neutralization). Developing the processes for fulfilling the cleaning/backpulsing requirements will result in more efficient operations for both the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and the Savannah River Site (SRS), thereby increasing throughput by limiting cleaning cycles. The purpose of this document is to summarize Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s (PNNL’s) literature review of historical filtration testing at the laboratory and of testing found in peer-reviewed journals. Eventually, the contents of this document will be merged with a literature review by SRS to produce a summary report for DOE of the results of previous filtration testing at the laboratories and the types of testing that still need to be completed to address the questions about improved filtration performance at WTP and SRS. To this end, this report presents 1) a review of the current state of crossflow filtration knowledge available in the peer-reviewed literature, 2) a detailed review of PNNL-related filtration studies specific to the Hanford site, and 3) an overview of current waste filtration models developed by PNNL and suggested avenues for future model development.

[1]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Implications of critical flux and cake enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP) on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis: Experimental observations , 2008 .

[2]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications , 2006 .

[3]  Ho,et al.  A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  J. Benavente,et al.  Electrokinetic phenomena in porous membranes: Determination of phenomenological coefficients and transport numbers , 1985 .

[5]  M. C. Porter Concentration Polarization with Membrane Ultrafiltration , 1972 .

[6]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Concentration Polarization of Interacting Solute Particles in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  Christopher F. Brown,et al.  Pretreatment Engineering Platform Phase 1 Final Test Report , 2009 .

[8]  B. A. Reynolds,et al.  Bench-scale cross flow filtration of Tank S-107 sludge slurries and Tank C-107 supernatant , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Particle¿particle interactions during normal flow filtration: Model simulations , 2005 .

[10]  Yuehe Lin,et al.  Crossflow filtration of chromium hydroxide suspension by ceramic membranes: fouling and its minimization by backpulsing , 2000 .

[11]  Norman Epstein,et al.  Electrokinetic flow through porous media composed of fine cylindrical capillaries , 1976 .

[12]  Richard C. Daniel,et al.  Estimation of Ultrafilter Performance Based on Characterization Data , 2007 .

[13]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  'Membrane Separation Systems : Recent Developments and Future Directions , 1991 .

[14]  I. W. Cumming,et al.  Crossflow microfiltration for mineral suspension thickening and washing , 1996 .

[15]  R. Holdich,et al.  Reversible adsorption inside pores of ultrafiltration membranes. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[16]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: experimental verification of fouling dynamics , 1999 .

[17]  Edgar C. Buck,et al.  Filtration and Leach Testing for PUREX Cladding Sludge and REDOX Cladding Sludge Actual Waste Sample Composites , 2009 .

[18]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Theoretical analysis of particle trajectories and sieving in a two-dimensional cross-flow filtration system , 2006 .

[19]  Siegfried Ripperger,et al.  Crossflow microfiltration – state of the art , 2002 .

[20]  Nanping Xu,et al.  Influences of pH and ionic strength on ceramic microfiltration of TiO2 suspensions , 2005 .

[21]  M. G. Parvatiyar,et al.  Mass transfer in a membrane tube with turbulent flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids , 1998 .

[22]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological suspension , 2005 .

[23]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Shear-induced transport of a particle layer along a porous wall , 1987 .

[24]  Kristian Keiding,et al.  Effect of water-swollen organic materials on crossflow filtration performance , 2009 .

[25]  M. Hoare,et al.  The effect of high frequency backflushing on the microfiltration of yeast homogenate suspensions for the recovery of soluble proteins , 1999 .

[26]  I. W. Cumming,et al.  Modelling of dead-end microfiltration with pore blocking and cake formation , 2002 .

[27]  Mikko O. Lamminen,et al.  Effect of Fouling Conditions and Cake Layer Structure on the Ultrasonic Cleaning of Ceramic Membranes , 2006 .

[28]  Christopher F. Brown,et al.  EFRT M-12 Issue Resolution: Comparison of Filter Performance at PEP and CUF Scale , 2009 .

[29]  Paul R. Bredt,et al.  Combined Entrained Solids and Sr/TRU Removal from AN-107 Diluted Feed , 2000 .

[30]  Alain Grasmick,et al.  Characterisation and modelling of fouling in membrane bioreactors , 2002 .

[31]  Edgar C. Buck,et al.  Characterization, Leaching, and Filtration Testing for Tributyl Phosphate (TBP, Group 7) Actual Waste Sample Composites , 2009 .

[32]  Alan S. Michaels,et al.  SOLUTE POLARIZATION AND CAKE FORMATION IN MEMBRANE ULTRAFILTRATION: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES , 1970 .

[33]  Michel Y. Jaffrin,et al.  Effect of cake thickness and particle polydispersity on prediction of permeate flux in microfiltration of particulate suspensions by a hydrodynamic diffusion model , 2000 .

[34]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  A similarity solution for steady-state crossflow microfiltration , 1990 .

[35]  Nanping Xu,et al.  Effects of inorganic salt on ceramic membrane microfiltration of titanium dioxide suspension , 2005 .

[36]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Particle transport in crossflow microfiltration – II. Effects of particle–particle interactions , 1999 .

[37]  R. Botet,et al.  Restructuring of colloidal cakes during dewatering. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[38]  Paul R. Bredt,et al.  Characterization, Washing, Leaching, and Filtration of C-104 Sludge , 2000 .

[39]  Vicki Chen,et al.  Non-invasive observation of synthetic membrane processes – a review of methods , 2004 .

[40]  Eugene C. Eckstein,et al.  Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of a suspension , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  Alex Martin,et al.  Streaming potential through and on ultrafiltration membranes: Influence of salt retention , 2002 .

[42]  Lk Jagoda,et al.  Demonstration of Entrained Solids and Sr/TRU Removal Processes with Archived AN-107 Waste , 2000 .

[43]  Mohammad Soltanieh,et al.  Investigation of membrane fouling in cross flow microfiltration of non-alcoholic beer and modeling of tubular membrane flow , 2010 .

[44]  Justin M. Billing,et al.  Validation of Ultrafilter Performance Model Based on Systematic Simulant Evaluation , 2009 .

[45]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[46]  M. Nyström,et al.  Streaming potential as a tool in the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes , 1989 .

[47]  John Gh Geeting,et al.  Optimization of ultrafilter feed conditions using classical filtration models , 2005 .

[48]  Geoff W. Stevens,et al.  The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes , 2006 .

[49]  Hélène Carrère,et al.  Study of hydrodynamic parameters in the cross-flow filtration of guar gum pseudoplastic solutions , 2000 .

[50]  Waite,et al.  Colloidal Fouling of Ultrafiltration Membranes: Impact of Aggregate Structure and Size. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[51]  Sergio Rodrigues Fontes Mass transfer in microfiltration with laminar and turbulent flow of macromolecular solutions , 2005 .

[52]  Syed S. H. Rizvi,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk , 2001 .

[53]  Justin M. Billing,et al.  Development and Demonstration of Ultrafiltration Simulants , 2009 .

[54]  G. R. Golcar,et al.  Development of Inactive High-Level Waste Envelope D Simulants for Scaled Crossflow Filtration Testing , 2000 .

[55]  G. Green,et al.  Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: lateral migration and the particle trajectory model , 1980 .

[56]  Greg Foley,et al.  Characterising the packing and dead-end filter cake compressibility of the polymorphic yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus NRRLy2415 , 2002 .

[57]  James E. Kilduff,et al.  Effect of colloids on salt transport in crossflow nanofiltration , 2010 .

[58]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Charge effects in the cross-flow filtration of colloids and particulates , 1989 .

[59]  D. Jiao,et al.  Mechanism of Cake Buildup in Crossflow Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions , 1994 .

[60]  Pierre Aimar,et al.  Modelling of filtration: from the polarised layer to deposit formation and compaction , 2002 .

[61]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Determining the zeta-potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect , 1998 .

[62]  Edgar C. Buck,et al.  Filtration and Leach Testing for REDOX Sludge and S-Saltcake Actual Waste Sample Composites , 2009 .

[63]  Zhanfeng Cui,et al.  In situ 3D characterization of membrane fouling by yeast suspensions using two-photon femtosecond near infrared non-linear optical imaging , 2006 .

[64]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Effect of Flocculation on Critical Flux during Crossflow Microfiltration of Bentonite Suspensions , 2008 .

[65]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Deposition of foulant particles during tangential flow filtration , 2006 .

[66]  Yves Aurelle,et al.  Unstable secondary oil/water emulsion treatment using ultrafiltration: fouling control by backflushing , 1999 .

[67]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Influence of ionic strength and pH of dispersed systems on microfiltration , 2004 .

[68]  Edgar C. Buck,et al.  Characterization, Leaching, and Filtration Testing for Bismuth Phosphate Sludge (Group 1) and Bismuth Phosphate Saltcake (Group 2) Actual Waste Sample Composites , 2009 .

[69]  B. A. Reynolds,et al.  Bench-scale crossflow filtration of Hanford tank C-106, C-107, B-110, and U-110 sludge slurries , 1997 .

[70]  Kirk J. Cantrell,et al.  Characterization of Filtration Scale-Up Performance , 2009 .

[71]  Richard C. Daniel,et al.  Integrated pore blockage-cake filtration model for crossflow filtration , 2011 .

[72]  Lianfa Song Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling , 1998 .

[73]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  A CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION MODEL FOR THE FILTRATE FLUX IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION OF PARTICULATE SUSPENSIONS , 1986 .

[74]  Paul R. Bredt,et al.  Characterization, Washing, Leaching, and Filtration of AZ-102 Sludge , 2000 .

[75]  Pedro Prádanos,et al.  The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[76]  Francis A. DiGiano,et al.  Fouling models for low-pressure membrane systems , 2009 .

[77]  A. Tremblay,et al.  Membrane regeneration and filtration modeling in treating oily wastewaters , 2008 .

[78]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  The influence of the membrane zeta potential on the critical flux for crossflow microfiltration of particle suspensions , 1999 .

[79]  Pierre Aimar,et al.  A unifying model for concentration polarization, gel-layer formation and particle deposition in cross-flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspensions , 2002 .

[80]  Richard G. Holdich,et al.  Prediction of deposit depth and transmembrane pressure during crossflow microfiltration , 1999 .

[81]  Richard C. Daniel,et al.  Bench-Scale Filtration Testing in Support of the Pretreatment Engineering Platform (PEP) , 2009 .

[82]  J Kim,et al.  Flocculation to enhance microfiltration , 2001 .

[83]  John Gh Geeting,et al.  Filtration, Washing, and Caustic Leaching of Hanford Tank AZ-101 Sludge , 2005 .

[84]  Edgar C. Buck,et al.  Characterization, Leaching, and Filtrations Testing of Ferrocyanide Tank sludge (Group 8) Actual Waste Composite , 2009 .

[85]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Modeling of transient permeate flux in cross-flow membrane filtration incorporating multiple particle transport mechanisms , 1997 .

[86]  R. Ocampo-Pérez,et al.  Adsorption of Fluoride from Water Solution on Bone Char , 2007 .

[87]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[88]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Calculation of limiting fluxes in the ultrafiltration of colloids and fine particulates , 1995 .

[89]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .