TaxMan: an online facility for the coding of continuous characters for cladistic analysis

A consensus is emerging that continuous (or metric) measures can be useful in phylogenetic systematics. Many of the methods for coding such characters, how- ever, employ elements that are arbitrary and therefore should be excluded from use in cladistic analysis. The continued use of such potentially inappropriate methods can be attributed to either their simplicity or the availability of computer programs specifically designed to produce data matrices using these methods. Conversely, one of the most suitable methods, homogeneous subset coding (HSC), is underused, probably due to the lack of a suitable software implementation for this somewhat complex procedure. This paper describes TaxMan, a Web-based facility for the coding of continuous data using HSC. Data are entered using a form accessible via any internet browser and are automatically converted to a matrix suitable for input into tree-searching software. This implementation of the HSC technique provides an uncomplicated procedure for the incorporation of metric data in phylogenetic systematics. The algorithmic implementation of the HSC procedure, and interpolation of the Studentised range and maximum modulus distributions required by it, is described in detail in appendices.

[1]  B. Crother,et al.  Is the PTP Test Useful? , 1998 .

[2]  C. Moritz,et al.  Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). , 2008, Systematic biology.

[3]  P. Goloboff,et al.  Continuous characters analyzed as such , 2006, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[4]  J. Farris The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis , 2004 .

[5]  C. Ward,et al.  Function, phylogeny, and fossils : miocene hominoid evolution and adaptations , 1997 .

[6]  Pauline Y. Ladiges,et al.  A CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF ANGOPHORA CAV. (MYRTACEAE) , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[7]  B. Wood,et al.  How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Chappill QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[9]  T. Rae Mosaic Evolution in the Origin of the Hominoidea , 1999, Folia Primatologica.

[10]  D. Pilbeam,et al.  Size and scaling in primate biology , 1986 .

[11]  T. Rae,et al.  The Logical Basis for the use of Continuous Characters in Phylogenetic Systematics , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[12]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[13]  V. Sosa,et al.  Coding Quantitative Character Data for Phylogenetic Analysis: A Comparison of Five Methods , 2006 .

[14]  MorphoCode: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis , 2004 .

[15]  J. Farris PHENETICS IN CAMOUFLAGE , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[16]  M. Zelditch,et al.  Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[17]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[18]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Pablo A. Goloboff,et al.  TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis , 2008 .

[20]  W. Jungers,et al.  Shape, relative size, and size‐adjustments in morphometrics , 1995 .

[21]  Finite Mixture Coding: A New Approach to Coding Continuous Characters , 1996 .

[22]  M. Pogue,et al.  CHARACTER DEFINITIONS AND CHARACTER STATE DELINEATION: THE BETE NOIRE OF PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[23]  J. WISHART,et al.  Statistical Tables , 2021, Nature.

[24]  Michael J. Sharkey,et al.  Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority‐Rule Consensus Trees , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[25]  Omar Torres‐Carvajal Phylogeny and biogeography of a large radiation of Andean lizards (Iguania, Stenocercus) , 2007 .

[26]  K. Thiele THE HOLY GRAIL OF THE PERFECT CHARACTER: THE CLADISTIC TREATMENT OF MORPHOMETRIC DATA , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[27]  J. Farris,et al.  The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .

[28]  C. Simon A New Coding Procedure for Morphometric Data with an Example from Periodical Cicada Wing Veins , 1983 .

[29]  Richard A. Pimentcl,et al.  THE NATURE OF CLADISTIC DATA , 1987, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[30]  P. Stevens Character States, Morphological Variation, and Phylogenetic Analysis: A Review , 1991 .

[31]  T. Rae The Early Evolution of the Hominoid Face , 1997 .

[32]  Christopher C. Gilbert,et al.  Congruence of molecules and morphology using a narrow allometric approach , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.