Are Workers Who Leave a Job Exposed to Similar Physical Demands as Workers Who Develop Clinically Meaningful Declines in Low-Back Function?

Objective: The objective is to quantify differences in physical exposures for those who stayed on a job (survivor) versus those who left the job (turnover). Background: It has been suggested that high physical job demands lead to greater turnover and that turnover rates may supplement low-back disorder incidence rates in passive surveillance systems. Method: A prospective study with 811 participants was conducted. The physical exposure of distribution center work was quantified using a moment monitor. A total of 68 quantitative physical exposure measures in three categories (load, position, and timing) were examined. Low-back health function was quantified using the lumbar motion monitor at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Results: There were 365 turnover employees within the 6-month follow-up period and 446 “survivors” who remained on the same job, of which 126 survivors had a clinically meaningful decline in low-back functional performance (cases) and 320 survivors did not have a meaningful decline in low-back functional performance (noncases). Of the job exposure measures, 6% were significantly different between turnover and cases compared to 69% between turnover and noncases. Turnover employees had significantly greater exposure compared to noncases. Conclusion: Turnover employees had similar physical job exposures to workers who remained on the job and had a clinically meaningful decline in low-back functional performance. Thus, ergonomists and HR should be aware that high turnover jobs appear to have similar physical exposure as those jobs that put workers at risk for a decline in low-back functional performance.

[1]  Steven A Lavender,et al.  Quantitative biomechanical workplace exposure measures: distribution centers. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  William S Marras,et al.  Revised protocol for the kinematic assessment of impairment. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  C. Muntaner,et al.  A glossary for the social epidemiology of work organisation: part 2 Terms from the sociology of work and organisations , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[4]  S. Simon,et al.  The effect of task asymmetry, age and gender on dynamic trunk motion characteristics during repetitive trunk flexion and extension in a large normal population , 1994 .

[5]  S R Simon,et al.  The Classification of Anatomic‐ and Symptom‐based Low Back Disorders Using Motion Measure Models , 1995, Spine.

[6]  W S Marras,et al.  The use of turnover rate as a passive surveillance indicator for potential low back disorders. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[7]  W. Marras,et al.  Quantitative Dynamic Measures of Physical Exposure Predict Low Back Functional Impairment , 2010, Spine.

[8]  J. Hurrell,et al.  Exposure to job stress--a new psychometric instrument. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  A. Sadosky,et al.  The Burden of Chronic Low Back Pain: Clinical Comorbidities, Treatment Patterns, and Health Care Costs in Usual Care Settings , 2012, Spine.

[10]  Steven A Lavender,et al.  Instrumentation for measuring dynamic spinal load moment exposures in the workplace. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  T R Waters,et al.  Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  Hokey Min,et al.  Examining sources of warehouse employee turnover , 2007 .

[13]  M. Campo,et al.  Job Strain in Physical Therapists , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[14]  J. Y. Kim,et al.  The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures. Methodology and validation. , 1999, Spine.

[15]  William S. Marras,et al.  Quantification of a Meaningful Change in Low Back Functional Impairment , 2009, Spine.

[16]  C. Hamrick,et al.  Costs by industry and diagnosis among musculoskeletal claims in a state workers compensation system: 1999-2004. , 2009, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  Judith K Sluiter,et al.  Stressful work, psychological job strain, and turnover: a 2-year prospective cohort study of truck drivers. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  J. Y. Kim,et al.  Quantification and classification of low back disorders based on trunk motion , 1993 .

[19]  Jim Briggs,et al.  A study of the effectiveness of ergonomically-based functional screening tests and their relationship to reducing worker compensation injuries. , 2008, Work.