Using Design-Based Research to Develop Meaningful Online Discussions in Undergraduate Field Experience Courses

From a design perspective, the intentionality of students to engage in surface or deep learning is often experienced through prescribed activities and learning tasks. Educators understand that meaningful learning can be furthered through the structural and organizational design of the online environment that motivates the student towards task completion. However, learning engagement is unique for each student. It is dependent on both how students learn and their intentions for learning. Based on this challenge, the design of online discussions becomes a pedagogical means in developing students’ intentionality for the adoption of strategies leading to deep learning. Through a Design-Based Research (DBR) approach, iterative design of online learning components for undergraduate field experience courses were studied. For this paper, the focus of the research is on examining factors that influenced deep and surface levels of learning in online discussion forums. The results indicate that design factors (i.e., student engagement, group structures, and organization) influence the nature and degree of deep learning. From the findings, two implications for practice are shared to inform the design and scaffolding of online discussion forums to foster deep approaches to student learning.

[1]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The 3P Learning Model , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  J. Atkinson The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issuesSage The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues 480 £24.95 0761926941 0761926941 , 2004 .

[3]  Anthony Francescucci,et al.  The VIRI (Virtual, Interactive, Real-Time, Instructor-Led) Classroom: The Impact of Blended Synchronous Online Courses on Student Performance, Engagement, and Satisfaction , 2013 .

[4]  T INGLES,et al.  An Experience in Learning , 1957, Nursing research.

[5]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[6]  L. Darling-Hammond Powerful teacher education : lessons from exemplary programs , 2006 .

[7]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[8]  Sofia B. Dias,et al.  Towards an Enhanced Learning Management System for Blended Learning in Higher Education Incorporating Distinct Learners' Profiles , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  Daniel V. Eastmond Alone but Together: Adult Distance Study through Computer Conferencing , 1995 .

[10]  Michael Corry,et al.  Designs, Management Tactics, and Strategies in Asynchronous Learning Discussions , 2003 .

[11]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  Marylin T. Leinenbach,et al.  Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[13]  Barry C. Dart,et al.  The Influences of Conceptions of Learning and Learner Self-Concept on High School Students' Approaches to Learning , 2003 .

[14]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[15]  A Search for the Complete Education: Balancing the Needs for Survival and Fulfillment , 2003 .

[16]  Olle Bälter,et al.  Student Approaches to Learning in Relation to Online Course Completion , 2013 .

[17]  Tina Benevides,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice , 2011 .

[18]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[19]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[20]  Muhammad K. Betz Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[21]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[22]  Aubteen Darabi,et al.  Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: a comparison of four discussion strategies , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Kari Lynne Kumar,et al.  Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course , 2014 .

[24]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Using Online Discussion Forums to Assist a Traditional English Class , 2007 .

[26]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  APPROACHES TO STUDYING AND LEVELS OF PROCESSING IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1988 .

[27]  D. Hounsell The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[28]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Socially Responsible Educational Technology Research. , 2000 .

[29]  L. Harasim Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement , 2003 .

[31]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  S. Donnison,et al.  Focusing on first year assessment: Surface or deep approaches to learning? , 2012 .

[33]  Petrea Redmond,et al.  Investigating Deep and Surface Learning in Online Collaboration , 2008 .

[34]  Europe Singh,et al.  Learning theory and online technologies , 2014 .

[35]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Conducting educational design research , 2013 .