Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jinsong Ouyang,et al. Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[2] H Paganetti,et al. Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[3] C. Watson. Extension of Single Scatter Simulation to Scatter Correction of Time-of-Flight PET , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[4] Katia Parodi,et al. Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[5] C. C. Watson. New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .
[6] Oliver Jäkel,et al. Positron emission tomography for quality assurance of cancer therapy with light ion beams , 1999 .
[7] Katia Parodi,et al. Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[8] Katia Parodi,et al. PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants. , 2007, Medical physics.
[9] Andrew J Reader,et al. AB-OSEM reconstruction for improved Patlak kinetic parameter estimation: a simulation study , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] W Enghardt,et al. On the feasibility of automatic detection of range deviations from in-beam PET data. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.
[11] H. Paganetti. Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.
[12] Katia Parodi,et al. Accuracy of proton beam range verification using post-treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography as function of treatment site. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[13] Akio Nagaki*,et al. Patient Weight–Based Acquisition Protocols to Optimize18F-FDG PET/CT Image Quality , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.
[14] R. Salem,et al. Internal Pair Production of 90Y Permits Hepatic Localization of Microspheres Using Routine PET: Proof of Concept , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] R. Carson,et al. Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.
[16] Christopher Kurz,et al. Implementation and initial clinical experience of offline PET/CT-based verification of scanned carbon ion treatment. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[17] L. V. Elmbt,et al. Feasibility of 90Y TOF PET-based dosimetry in liver metastasis therapy using SIR-Spheres , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[18] Thomas Beyer,et al. Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[19] D. Schardt,et al. Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .
[20] Katia Parodi,et al. PET imaging for treatment verification of ion therapy: Implementation and experience at GSI Darmstadt and MGH Boston , 2008 .
[21] Patrick Dupont,et al. Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[22] Charles L. Byrne,et al. Accelerating the EMML algorithm and related iterative algorithms by rescaled block-iterative methods , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..
[23] Katia Parodi,et al. Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT): Initial clinical experience in the first 80 patients , 2010, Acta oncologica.
[24] Julian C. Matthews,et al. Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: benefits of a resolution model , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).
[25] Katia Parodi,et al. Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[26] E. Pedroni,et al. The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.
[27] O Jäkel,et al. The Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[28] O Jäkel,et al. Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy: clinical implementation and application. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.
[29] Keiichi Nakagawa,et al. The development and clinical use of a beam ON-LINE PET system mounted on a rotating gantry port in proton therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[31] M. Senda,et al. Investigation of single, random, and true counts from natural radioactivity in LSO-based clinical PET , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[32] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithms for the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[33] M. Conti. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[34] H Bal,et al. Improving PET spatial resolution and detectability for prostate cancer imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[35] D. Townsend,et al. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.